India's Batsmen Continue Dominance, but World Cup Will Present Stiff Challenges

There was a depressing inevitability about it, watching Angelo Mathews scrap to conjure something at least bordering on a competitive total for Sri Lanka against India at Ahmedabad in the second one-day international of the series on Thursday.
Such is India's dominance when chasing that Mathews' endeavour was admirable, but it also felt pointless. It was like watching your not-too-bright friend spend hours on an application for a job that you know is far beyond their reach.
Battling against the tide of a stuttering innings, the Sri Lankan captain, with little fluency, made 92 unbeaten runs of his own to help the visitors set a target of 275 for the home side.
But on a flat pitch underneath the baking sun of western India, it was never enough. Not against these Indians, anyway, who continue to dispose of opponents when chasing as though they're merely carrying the recycling to the curb on a balmy summer evening.

Just as they've done rather emphatically to England and Australia in recent times, India reached the required total with alarming ease. When Ambati Rayudu slapped the winning blow over cover from Seekkuge Prasanna, it was done with five-and-a-half overs still up the sleeve.
"The 300 mark, [it] makes a lot of difference," Mathews remarked in defeat after the match, per the Press Trust of India (via IndianExpress.com). In truth, however, 300 wouldn't have been enough either—India would have reached that figure without adding a single mile to the pace with which they were travelling.
What's sobering for opponents is that one doesn't have to delve too far into the numbers to see that this is a trend.
India have now won six of their last eight ODIs when chasing. Scarily, a six-wicket margin has been the narrowest in any of those triumphs.
And if you limit it to only matches played in Asia, the men in blue have won 27 of their last 32 completed ODIs when batting second, dating back to 2010.
The old adage of scoreboard pressure? India, in coloured clothing, don't seem to know what that is. With their moderate total of 274-8, Sri Lanka didn't stand a chance.

Since the beginning of last October, India have six batsmen (Mahendra Singh Dhoni, Virat Kohli, Shikhar Dhawan, Rohit Sharma, Ravindra Jadeja and Rayudu) averaging in excess of 40 in 50-over cricket. Of those, Dhoni is almost touching 70, while both Kohli and Sharma sit above 50 with ease.
The lowest strike rate among them? Rayudu's 81.28, which may take you by surprise after he crashed his way to 121 from only 118 deliveries in Thursday's resounding victory.
That those figures also exclude one-day batsmen as fine as Suresh Raina and Ajinkya Rahane only serves to reinforce the staggering extent of India's power with the blade.
In theory, that dominance with the bat should see India enjoy a deep and successful World Cup campaign when the global tournament begins in Australia and New Zealand in February.
Since the turn of the century, cricket's showpiece event has been defined by batting excellence. At both the 2011 and 2007 editions, both victors (India and Australia, respectively) recorded tournament-highs in run rate, while Australia's capture of the 2003 edition was achieved with the highest collective batting average.
Quite simply, runs—not wickets—win World Cups.

But there's a catch for India: The team's travels to cricket's southernmost destinations have been as successful as a British teenager's attempts to stay sober in Magaluf.
When visiting Australia, New Zealand and South Africa—the game's locations that own the sort of pace and bounce that isn't found in wickets elsewhere—only Dhoni and Kohli have maintained strong records among the aforementioned Indian stars.
Raina, Sharma, Rayudu and Jadeja all average less than 30 in such destinations. For Dhawan, the figure drops below 20. For Rahane, it's less than 10.
The team's result in its most recent visit to New Zealand? A 4-0 loss.
Last time to South Africa? A 2-0 loss.
Last time to Australia? A 3-1 loss (if you consider only the matches played against the home side in a triangular series that also included Sri Lanka).
And the defeats haven't been narrow ones, either.

Plagued by the limitations inherent in their subcontinental games, there's been no carryover effect for India's batsmen when swapping Mumbai for Melbourne or leaving Nagpur for Newlands.
On paper, India's batting unit will undoubtedly be the strongest in the approaching World Cup, but Asian dominance will count for little when the tournament kicks off in less than 100 days.
Sri Lanka are likely to be flattened across the next week, the impressive Indian figures will likely be added to and expectation will grow for the defence of India's title.
Whether any of it holds a single degree of relevance for the World Cup, however, remains rather doubtful.