Reading

N/A

Tag Type
Slug
reading
Short Name
Reading
Abbreviation
REA
Sport ID / Foreign ID
sr:competitor:28
Visible in Content Tool
On
Visible in Programming Tool
On
Auto create Channel for this Tag
On
Parents
Primary Parent
Primary Color
#0038a8
Secondary Color
#dd1740
Channel State

USGP organizers tout Perez’s signing with Sauber

Oct 14, 2010


You think the U.S. Grand Prix organizers are happy about their Mexican connection?

If you do — you’re right.

Full Throttle Productions sent out a press release today highlighting “The latest info from Formula 1 United States.”

It is all about new Sauber driver Sergio Perez.

The first announcement is that organizers have launched a Spanish language version of their website. There’s good reason for this, as they note:

As the largest minority group in the United States and the third most common language spoken across the globe, the Hispanic market can now easily view the Formula 1 United States website in their native language.

Totally true. But would they have done so without Mexican Perez’s signing with Sauber? I’m skeptical. Especially after reading the “personal note” from head promoter Tavo Hellmund:

Tavo Hellmund, Chairman of Formula 1 United States™, congratulates Sergio Perez for joining BMW Sauber next year.

“I have followed Sergio’s career and was ecstatic he will be a Formula 1 driver next year,” said Tavo Hellmund. “I spoke with my friends Carlos Slim and Sergio, and all of us agree the 2012 Formula 1 United States Grand Prix™ will be like a home race for Sergio. We all look forward to working together to maximize this wonderful opportunity.”

“Carlos’ program of supporting talented, young Mexican drivers is clearly bearing fruit. Others will certainly find ways to duplicate it around the world.”

Now, don’t get me wrong. I think this is a smart strategy for the USGP as a way to build a “targeted” audience for the race. I just hope the organizers realize that their broader audience — non-Spanish speaking Americans — might not be as enthusiastic about a Mexican driver. That’s just the way it is.

As a supplement to its main outreach, this makes sense. Mexico, especially Northern Mexico, is a prime market geographically for the race. But I can see backlash to a stream of USGP promotion that features Perez because Formula 1 lacks a U.S. team or U.S. driver.

At least there isn’t a picture featuring Mexican President Felipe Calderon, Perez and Hellmund.

But what do you think? Is the USGP right to be riding Perez’s coattails?

Your View: Russia is in, who is out? Who do you cut?

Oct 14, 2010


As we reported yesterday, F1 boss Bernie Ecclestone has signed a deal to allow Russia to host a round of the FIA Formula One World Championship. The news has been met with excitement and wonderment over the prospects and the re-use of the Sochi Olympic Village as the backdrop for a street circuit that is rumored to be 5.5 miles long. I must admit, that kind of length does get my F1 receptors on end. A Russian website has even released their impression of the Tilke design here.

Join me in navigating back through 2010 to the release of the 2011 schedule for F1 and you will recall that Eccelstone said 20 races was about the maximum the series could sustain. With India, South Korea, United States and now Russian all coming online between 2010 and 2015, it prompts the usual question, “which circuit is getting the axe?”

So Russia is in but who is out? This isn’t all off-the-cuff as it seems. Ecclestone know who he is negotiating with and who he has little continuing interest in. He is a keen businessman and knows which tracks will most likely not see the light of day in 2012-2015. He know which circuits make money and which circuits are loss-leaders for the sport as well as which circuits hold no more tangible value for Formula One Management and the teams. He understand track economics and which circuits are doing well and which aren’t. He understands which political issues are worth battling at each circuit and which aren’t. He also know which organizers bring the most value to his operation. In short, he knows what the hell he is doing.

The only issue is that we don’t know what the hell he is doing and what he will do to who to make room for the Russian Grand Prix…another street circuit by Tilke. So let’s start a short list. Which circuits would we envision leaving F1? Attendance, track economics, viable markets, relevancy to FOM and teams, applicable to good TV times and viewership. All of these are elements to consider.

Turkey
Spa Francorchamps
Australia
Hockenhiem/Nurburgring
Hungaroring
Suzuka
Valencia

What’s your list? Who do you see at risk of leaving the 1 calendar? One thing to keep in mind is that this is an organic process and not terminal for infinity. Ecclestone knows that a 2-4 year hiatus at Spa is not the end of the world but does give other venues a chance to leak cash into his system for 3-7 years at the same time building angst over the return of the missing Belgium circuit. After a 3-4 year absence, the organizers may pay more for the return and fans will be clamoring for its rightful place on the F1 calendar.

It’s all economics and it is motivated by demand and opportunity mixed with cash and politics in a grand junta where the royalty always avoids the beheading and the rising ire of the masses is usually quelled through sheer indifference…the mightiest of anti-revolutionary weapons.

F1 teams talk changes to race weekend. What would you want to see?

Oct 14, 2010


The Formula 1 team bosses were pretty busy during those rain delays at the Japanese Grand Prix. First we heard that they talked about ways to ensure no one takes advantage of the new tire development, and now word is coming out that they also talked about how to revamp race weekends — in part to be more fan-friendly.

I know, I know. I’m shocked, too. They thought about the fans? Those rain delays must have really had them going stir crazy.

Here’s the news on this, via Autosport:

During a lengthy Formula One Teams’ Association (FOTA) meeting in Japan last weekend, the outfits discussed ways to improve the sport in the future – and even talked about the two-day weekend format forced on them in Japan becoming the norm.

But although there was little support for knocking a day off a grand prix weekend – especially as circuits need the extra revenue that comes from three-day events – teams did feel that improvements could be made elsewhere, and especially whether the Fridays could be used better.

Bernie Ecclestone and the FIA, of course, would have to be part of any discussions to make changes.

So, while this seems a long shot, it still might be worth getting out ideas heard. What says F1B? What changes to race weekends would you like to see?

Horner vows to let Vettel and Webber fight it out

Oct 13, 2010


Red Bull team boss Christian Horner again is insisting the team will allow Sebastian Vettel and Mark Webber fight it out on the grid for the Formula 1 drivers championship.

If they slam into each other and Fernando Alonso pulls it out, let’s remember this date. Here’s what Horner says, via the BBC (which picks it up here if you want to watch):

“It’s not correct, as we’ve always said, for us to favour one driver over the other.

“The team will support both drivers as equally as we can.

“It will be very, very tough but there is a good chance for both of our drivers.

“It’s fantastic that we have got two drivers still competing in the drivers’ championship and we will give both drivers as good a chance as we can to win it.”

Horner does sounds a bit cautious when talking about the next race at the just-approved track in Korea:

“Looking at the track layout you would have to say, with the longest straight on the calendar, that section is going to be tough for us with the package that we have,” he added.

“But then sectors two and three have quite a lot of corners and fast-flowing corners so hopefully they should suit our chassis strengths more.

“With the strengths and weaknesses that we have, we should be competitive but again, you take nothing for granted. We have to do our homework and we have to keep working hard.

“Obviously we are very focused on that race.”

That sounds like a man who is hoping his drivers get on the podium or darn close. Alonso, and the two McLaren drivers, might want to bring a little extra with them next week. It could be their chance to make a good push.

F1 Biography: ‘Funky Formula’

Oct 13, 2010


Race car drivers sometimes fancy themselves as musicians, picking up the odd guitar, such as the likes of Damon Hill or Kenny Brack have been wont to do. Sometimes they may come in the form of a classically trained, Roman pianist called Elio de Angelis. Even a team owner, Eddie Jordan for example, might consider himself a semi-pro drummer of sorts.

On the opposite end of this funky formula are musicians who, when they find nothing better to do with their hard earned millions, get behind the wheel to try their calloused fingers at something new. One would be hard pressed to find any of them with any real form of success on the track, however. Christopher Cross went toodling about in the American Racing Series (later Indy Lights) and Andrew Ridgeley tried his hand at F3 after the demise of Wham (sniffle), but both second careers were short lived and rather uneventful.

But there are also the dual musical and racing careers of Swedish drummer Tommy “Slim” Borgudd. As a musician, recording studio sessions with the biggest group in the world cannot do much harm to one’s CV. Scoring a World Championship point in only your second Grand Prix whilst driving for a serious backmarker must also count for something (one point?).

Karl Edward Tommy Borgudd was born in 1946 in Borghol near Kalmar on the small Swedish island of Oland. At fourteen years old, he was already playing in his first band; the blues rock influenced Lee Riders Group. Following a handful of singles, the band would break up in ’68 and Tommy would then help to form a jazz rock fusion group called Made in Sweden. Several albums later, this band would splinter off into Solar Plexus, which would also record a few albums before punk and disco would all but kill off their genre of progressive rock in the mid ‘70s.

On an early tour of the States, Tommy and his band were in a New Orleans nightclub to see one of their influences, the Willie Dixon Band. When it was announced that the headliners would not be able to play due to their drummer, “Memphis Slim”, being suddenly ill, Tommy’s friends pushed him onstage. He sat in with his idols and was dutifully nicknamed “Little Slim”.

The racing bug, meanwhile, first bit Slim when he saw Stirling Moss in an F2 race at Karlskoga in 1959. Shortly thereafter, Slim met British dixieland musician Chris Barber, an avid racer himself, from whom Borgudd bought a Formula Ford Lotus 22. He took part in a few Swedish club events before attending the Jim Russell Racing School at Snetterton. He then won the next two races that he took part in.

The 1970s were spent in a myriad of cars and formulae. He bought an ex-Ronnie Peterson Focus sportscar, entering five races and winning them all. He won Swedish and Scandinavian championships in saloon cars and Formula Ford 1600, as well as taking part in local and European F3 rounds, finishing 3rd in the ’79 European championship behind winner Alain Prost.

1980 would promise sponsorship from Marlboro for F2, but the money would never come, leaving Slim without a ride for the season. He would borrow a car from a fellow competitor for the Monaco F3 race and, from a 16th starting spot, fight his way up to 3rd before contact with another car would loosen his own bodywork. Rather than retiring, Borgudd would complete the last several laps with one hand on the steering wheel and the other holding the bodywork onto the car. Though it would cause him to drop down the finishing order to 10th, the drive would get the attention of several F1 team owners, including Colin Chapman and Ken Tyrrell.

During these years, Slim had continued playing with his own bands and recording a solo album titled “Funky Formula”, as well as doing studio work with other artists. Early on, he had played with a group called the Hootenanny Singers, led by guitarist Bjorn Ulvaeus. When Bjorn would later go on to form ABBA with Benny Andersson, he would call upon his old friend Slim to help with some studio recordings.

In 1981, at the age of 34, Borgudd would finally get an opportunity in Formula One with the struggling ATS team at the San Marino Grand Prix. Bjorn lent the ABBA name, but no sponsorship dollars, to the ATS sidepods in an attempt to attract other investors to the cash strapped team. While his experienced teammate, Jan Lammers, failed to qualify, Slim started 24th and finished 13th on his GP debut. Team owner Gunter Schmid duly kicked Lammers out of the team and ran a single car with Slim for the remainder of the season.

Borgudd himself failed to qualify for the next four races before squeaking into a 21st grid spot at Silverstone. Following a race of high attrition, Slim would go on to finish sixth, earning his first and only WDC point. In the remaining six races of the season, he would only finish one more event, a respectable 10th in the Dutch GP.

Ken Tyrrell could not help notice that Borgudd had outqualified his own driver, Michele Alboretto, during the last half of ’81, so he signed the Swede to partner the Italian for the following year. But as Alboretto would perform well over the season, in fact going on to win the last race of the year, Slim would be out after just three GPs, having been well off his teammate’s pace and with no sponsorship money to keep his seat secure. And with that, his short F1 career was over.

The coming years would see Slim return to tin tops in both the European Touring Cars and BTCC and even F3 at Macau, but he would make his name with multiple class championships in the European Truck Racing Cup. Musically, Borgudd may not have had the same level of success as other artists who have tried their hand at racing, but how many of those musicians can claim multiple championships in such a variety of machinery as the Swede they call Slim?

Op Ed: “If you no longer go for a gap …”

Oct 12, 2010


As I shared in this week’s #F1Chat Preview column and during the chat yesterday, I appreciated that much of the television coverage of Sunday’s Japanese Grand Prix centered on the midfield battles and not so much on the race leaders. It was a refreshing change, one that I think was noted by broadcasters and fans alike.

Once the literal dust and debris settled after the start, and the Red Bulls once again charged to the front, we were then treated to Nico Rosberg versus Michael Schumacher then Kamui Kobayashi versus anyone and everyone in his path. Kobayashi did not disappoint his home crowd, nor did he disappoint this F1 fan. Everyone around the world took notice.

Along with the race this weekend, fans at Suzuka were treated to the world premiere of “Senna: The Movie”, the much-anticipated documentary about the late Ayrton Senna. Senna is perhaps admired and revered as much in Japan as in his native Brazil, so it was fitting that the movie debut there. With the release of the movie and the marking of what would have been his 50th birthday this year, there is a renewed appreciation of Senna and his career – a career filled with amazing skill, talent and controversy at the same time.

Perhaps the look back at Senna and his era makes each of us wish for the return of true racing and some new classic moments for Formula 1. With perhaps a little controversy thrown in for good measure. No, not controversy from team orders or the latest “-gate” but from drivers “going for a gap”, “taking the risk” and “racing to win” as Senna so aptly told Jackie Stewart in the now-famous interview.

Maybe Formula 1’s occasional predictable processions and lack of overtaking should not be blamed on circuit design. That’s too easy. As fans, why should we pray for rain just to keep things interesting? True racing seems to rarely happen at the front of the pack anymore – and that’s where it should always happen.

I miss racing drivers.

It was fun to watch the brief battle between Mercedes’ Rosberg and Schumacher Sunday and think back to other teammates squabbling at Suzuka. And, for the first time since Red Bull “gave Mark wings” at Valencia, I held my breath –

— as I watched Kobayashi race.

F1 teams working on open arrangement for all with Pirelli

Oct 12, 2010


Well, there goes Nick Heidfeld’s best argument for a seat in 2011.

Apparently, the Formula 1 teams have realized that if they don’t all collectively agree to have an open and “transparent” agreement in place regarding the development of the 2011 tires, someone might try to gain an advantage by working out a closer arrangement with incoming provider Pirelli.

You don’t say?

Autosport is reporting that the teams met during the Japanese Grand Prix to discuss the issue:

Although the details of the arrangement have not been finalised yet, the principle is for Pirelli to supply every team with information when there are any requests from individual outfits about tyre development or data.

Sauber managing director Monisha Kaltenborn told AUTOSPORT: “When we went into this whole deal with Pirelli we laid a lot of emphasis on the fact that there would be transparency.

“We ourselves are not entirely sure how it is going to work because we have not had that kind of situation before, but the route is generally where it comes to general information/questions we share them, like is done on electronic side.”

Virgin Racing CEO Graeme Lowdon added: “I think it is less a case of pooling information, more an agreement for people to be open.

“What no one wanted was to see a special relationship developing between the new supplier and a particular team, so everyone is of the opinion for there to be no special relationships

“There is no established system, but the idea if someone goes to the tyre supplier and asks for some information then everybody will get it, rather than something special or unique.

“You will still have your tyre man allocated to you, and still work on a one-to-one basis there, but the general picture is that everyone is afforded the same information.”

Hmm… when it is put that way, maybe Nick does still have some hope. A team just could come to him with its questions and never bother Pirelli. I can’t see how Nick won’t provide some advantage. I just don’t know where the open spot might be unless it is way to the back of the grid.

But back to the tires. While this deal sounds good in principle, even right off the top of my head — without my evil Ross Brawn thinking cap on — I can figure out ways to game the system.

The most obvious is to ask a question (Question A) that will give you a particular set of answers (or so you suspect, especially if Nick has been able to help you think the issue through) while really seeking the answer to Question B. That way you avoid tipping your hat (or evil thinking cap) to the other teams.

Or you ask Pirelli to do a quick test with a pile of bricks on the back of the car. Who would ever suspect it was really a cagey way to see how your secret uber diffuser will play out on the track? (OK, maybe everyone.)

Now, certainly, F1 will be better off with such an agreement in place. But do any of us really think the teams that are creative about their development won’t figure out ways to take advantage of the new tires and get around this?

What are we, new to F1?

Korean circuit passes FIA test, grand prix is on!

Oct 12, 2010


After two days of circuit inspection, the Korean Grand Prix will go ahead as planned in twelve days time. The FIA’s Charlie Whiting issued a “green light” for the circuit after examining the safety and condition of the track according to the race organizers via Mr. Noble at AUTOSPORT.

“We are delighted that all works are now finished to the complete satisfaction of the FIA, and we join the whole of Korea in welcoming the Formula 1 fraternity to the Korea International Circuit for the first time,” he said.

“The KIC has been constructed to the highest standards, and will become the epicentre of motorsport in the country. We believe the Korean Grand Prix will be the catalyst to ignite enormous interest in the sport across the nation.”

According to the organizers, Whiting said he would issue a circuit license to (ASN) KARA and that he was satisfied with the results of the inspection.

There have been many concerns over the preparedness of the circuit and while the infrastructure appears to be in varying degrees of completion, it would seem that Whiting feels the actual track and safety structures are in place and capable of hosting a grand prix.

Korea is making a bid for large events such as the G20 summit as well as the 2018 Olympics and a cancellation of the race would have reflected very poorly on the country as well as organizers. It would have also had a negative impact on F1 as well and while we are all delighted the show will go on, we are also reticent of some of the difficulties that could be experienced with a hastily completed circuit.

Whiting certainly knows what he is looking at and how to host a grand prix…he’s seen a few in his day so I take comfort that the safety systems are in place and that this will be a successful event even if the amenities are quite spartan in appeal. All eyes will be on the asphalt as it was laid last week and the forces of the cars in the heat of battle are immense.

The big question now is, who will the circuit favor? Red Bull, Ferrari or McLaren?

Webber: I couldn’t let Seb take the triple crown

Oct 11, 2010


There’s a little bit of buzz after the Japanese Grand Prix about Mark Webber pulling the fastest lap out of his RBR and denying pole, the win and the quickest lap to team mate Sebastian Vettel.

Well, make no mistake, that was the idea.

In the review of the race on his official website, Webber is straight-forward about his dash to be fastest: “I couldn’t let Seb take the triple crown, could I?”

The quotation is even highlighted a bit. Here’s the full context:

For the remainder of the race, Mark and Sebastian were never more than a couple of seconds apart and they traded fastest laps – a battle that Mark won on the final lap (“I couldn’t let Seb take the triple crown, could I?”). In the closing laps they were able to wind down their engines, but both drivers had to keep pushing to remain clear of Alonso.

I wonder how Seb will feel about that.

While we’re at his site, here’s the rest of the quotes from Webber:

“It was a good day at the office,” says Mark. “You always want to win, but second was okay. The difference between Seb and I this weekend was the half-tenth that separated us in qualifying; that gave him track position at the start of the race, on a circuit where it’s very difficult to overtake.

“I completed one installation lap on Saturday,” says Mark. “It was immediately apparent that the track conditions were too treacherous for F1 cars. To do nothing for a whole day of a grand prix weekend felt a bit odd; it reminded me of testing in the early ’00s and it made me quite glad that we’re no longer allowed to test during the season!”

“Robert made an absolute scorcher of a start,” says Mark. “He cannoned out of the blocks and was through. Luckily he retired a few laps later, while we were behind the Safety Car. His Renault was very quick in a straight-line and it would have been difficult to pass him on the track.”

“Fernando got a bit closer in the last few laps,” says Mark, “but I had him covered. To be honest, it was a formation finish for Red Bull Racing from about lap nine. We pushed all the way, but Seb and I were so evenly matched that I needed him to make a mistake in order to pass. He didn’t give me that opportunity.”

“The RB6 is the best racing car I’ve ever driven,” says Mark. “It was nice to celebrate Red Bull’s third one-two of the season with Adrian. I hope he felt the trip here was worthwhile!”

“It’s always fun to go to a new track,” says Mark. “It’s something different for everyone, but don’t expect its newness to shake up the order. The drivers in F1 are all very good and it will take only a few laps to learn.”

That last bit is one time when Mark’s no BS attitude actually works against fans. It would be a lot more exciting if we could be made to believe that Korea might throw something unusual our way.

Will Japan’s waning interest kill Kobayashi’s dream?

Oct 11, 2010


If you watched the Japanese Grand Prix this past weekend, you saw a bit of an exhibition from local hero Kamui Kobayashi. The aggressive driving style that delighted F1 fans last year was back and in full force. The Japanese driver pulled off some impressive passing moves and was picking off foes like a seasoned veteran. Many have commented on his bravery and can-do attitude and this weekend proved that Kamui may just be the “real thing” when it comes to successful and talented Japanese drivers.

All the accolades are well placed and Kobayashi has a ride for 2011 with Sauber but how long will that last with Telmex CEO Carlos Slim’s money and two Mexican drivers squarely planted at the team? Speed TV’s Will Buxton had a very real and fair look at the waning market that is Japan in the sport of F1. I thought it was well reasoned and spoke to the culminating details that, when combined, show a country falling away from the sport.

No Honda, Toyota, Fuji circuit or Fuji TV host broadcast as has always been the norm. Kobayashi was groomed by Toyota’s racing program and got his shot in the seat last year subbing for injured Timo Glock. He made a name for himself and is truly sitting on the grid on merit alone as the Japanese interest in F1 has tarnished over the last 18 months.

I was reading Mr. Noble’s article regarding the hopes of Peter Sauber with regards to this issue. Sauber is suggesting that maybe Kobayashi’s drive Sunday could renew some interest in sponsorship for the driver and team and while I tend to hope with him, I also understand what that ultimately means. Mr. Kobayashi would do well to find some sponsors from Japan to help maintain his career past 2011.

As Speed’s Buxton pointed out, the Japanese Grand Prix could be at risk should other venues come online. The attendance is down, the manufacturers have gone and the two remaining Japanese drivers have little backing from home. It’s a sad situation that faces the reality of F1 unabated. Having watched numerous Japanese drivers try to enter F1 on the coattails of a Japanese manufacturer and fail, we finally have a driver that has the talent and now no vehicle in which to support him.

If Kobayashi’s career falters it will be the case of horrible timing because I think the young man has what it takes to be a very good driver in F1. He shows several signs of bravery, pace and control that Nakajima, Sato and Yamamoto do not. It truly is a shame if it doesn’t happen for Kobayashi because this is the one driver the land of the rising sun should be getting behind.