Iowa State Football

N/A

Tag Type
Slug
iowa-state-football
Short Name
Iowa State
Abbreviation
ISU
Sport ID / Foreign ID
CFB_ISU
Visible in Content Tool
On
Visible in Programming Tool
On
Auto create Channel for this Tag
On
Parents
Primary Parent
Primary Color
#951010
Secondary Color
#fdc82f
Channel State
Eyebrow Text
Football

Previewing UNLV’s Opponents: Iowa State Cyclones

Aug 17, 2008

This game wraps up a home-and-home with the Rebels where the last game was at Iowa State where they won 16-10. 

The last few years for Iowa State have not been good; in fact, the team has not been exciting since quarterback Seneca Wallace walked around campus.

When this game rolls around in September and will be each teams fourth game, so by then we will know if Iowa State has a pulse or not.

Offense: Iowa State returns seven offensive starters, but the most glaring omission is trying to replace former four-year starter Bret Meyer. Not only was Meyer durable, he finished his career on a streak of 48 straight starts, and was very effective.

Meyer left Ames as Iowa State’s all-time leader with 9,499 passing yards and 10,422 yards of total offense. 

The most likely replacement is sophomore Austin Arnaud, a local product and was groomed last year by appearing in six games in his Freshman campaign.

However, during spring practice sophomore Phillip Bates emerged to make the quarterback race more interesting.

As of now, during fall camp the team has gone through four scrimmages and coach Chizik said, “Both of them moved the ball well today. They are progressing well. We didn’t turn the ball over at all today.”  The race is still a dead heat with less then two weeks to opening day.

As for the running back position, they were receiving high praise during the same scrimmage with the backs able to run strong up the middle of the line.  This is the deepest position that the Cyclones have because last year the top three returning backs rushed for 100 yards in at least one game last season.   

Sophomore Alexander Robinson looks to be the lead back, because he is more complete in being able to make people miss and can catch the ball out of the backfield.  Last year he caught 23 balls for 167 yards, so Robinson is capable adding another dimension to the offense. 

Two other backs will push Robinson for carries. Senior Jason Scales started five games, and his best came against Nebraska with 115 yards on the ground, and the other is J.J. Bass who is a junior college transfer from a year ago and had 446 yards rushing in his first year of Division 1 football.

In the receiver area, the Cyclones' other significant loss on offense was standout receiver Todd Blythe, who made 52 catches for a team-high 779 yards and five touchdowns last year.

Blythe is the all-time leader in Iowa State history in the three main categories for wide receivers with 176 receptions, 3,096 yards and 31 touchdowns.

Replacements will be Senior R.J. Sumrall after leading the team with 54 catches for 434 yards last season, including a career high eight grabs against Missouri. 

Also, junior Marquis Hamilton is the closest thing the Cyclones have to a big body who could replace Blythe.

Defense:  The team returns seven starters, and they will need the help as they gave up 31 points per game, but this year they do not have to face Oklahoma or Texas, plus they get Missouri and Kansas at home.  The defense should be improved just on that part. 

The biggest change is that the defensive line has to replace their interior lineman, and that could be trouble since their rush defense was not that great this past year.

The inexperience will be what hurts this team, but the coaching staff believes the depth will be fine, but just needs the playing time.

The linebacking area is another tough spot, with the team's top two tacklers from last years team are not there any more.  The lone returning starter is junior middle linebacker Jesse Smith, who had 79 tackles, 4.5 tackles for loss and two forced fumbles in his 12 starts last year.  If he can improve off that, he has a chance to become all league for 2008.

The defense last year just had a hard time with their difficult schedule, but even with the ‘easier’ schedule it will be tough for Iowa State to be too much better.

Early Prediction:  This game is on the road where the Cyclones struggled the past few years, and UNLV should be improved this game will be a pick’em but as of now I will go with Iowa State.

MIDWEST RACING GEM

Jul 10, 2008

The great racing gem of the Midwest is not Chicagoland, and its not Kansas Speedway, and not Knoxville Raceway. It's the Iowa Speedway. It lays in the middle of the great Iowa corn fields in Newton. The 7/8thof a mile Track was designed by NASCAR's Rusty Wallace. The track features 3 lanes of progressive banking in the turns from 12 degrees on the low lane to 13 in the middle and 14 on the high lane. The track also opens up into a 1.3 mile road course. The Rusty Wallace track dubbed "America's Place to Race" was built in in early 2006. The grandstands to date hold 40,000 people, with the capacity to build more stands around the turns anddown the back stretch. Rusty built this track with one of NASCAR's current stops on the racing schedule in mind, Richmond.

I myself have been to Iowa speedway 5 times, and each time is a unique experience, the racing is never dull never boring, and many of times produces close finishes. And for the record there is not a bad seat in the house.

Many of NASCAR's current stars have been to the racetrack and have given it high praises. The past two years the winner of the Allstar Race (Harvick & Khane) have appeared the next day at Iowa to compete in the Camping World tour Series. On Sunday July 20 both Matt Kenseth and Kyle Rowdy Busch will make their Iowa Speedway debut in the The Rasmussen Group Twin 75’s ASA Midwest Tour Super Late Model Series. one of NASCAR's top owners, Richard Childress, Told the Des Moines Register that he was committed to getting a Nationwide and  Craftsman truck race to the speedway, while Iowa was left out of NASCAR's Schedule for 2008, the Iowa Speedway will be given long hard consideration for '09. The Speedways biggest argument is being the 2nd largest attended Indy Car Series race. Second only to the Indianapolis 500.

I don't know if Iowa will ever lay host to a Sprint Cup Date, but I would not be surprised to see "Rusty's Place: A Great American Place to Race, AKA Iowa Speedway."  on the Nationwide or Truck Schedule for '09 and beyond. So if your ever in the area, come on by to Newton, Iowa and have a look for yourself.

for further info on the IOWA SPEEDWAY please see www.iowaspeedway.com

Colorado Football - CU v. Michigan (1994) - "The Catch"

Jul 1, 2008

Two top ten teams.  A national television audience, with Keith Jackson at the microphone.  Already a marquee matchup, the game would end with one of the most memorable calls in college football history.

 

September 24th - @ Michigan               #7 Colorado 27, #4 Michigan 26

 

While there is much to be said about the final six seconds of the 1994 Colorado/Michigan game, the set-up is equally important. Both teams had the opportunity to dominate the game, but fell short. Momentum swayed back and forth before 106,427 fans, the largest crowd to witness a Colorado football game in school history.

 

 

Midway through the second quarter, the Buffs were putting on a show for the Wolverine faithful. Up 14-3, CU threatened to make the game a rout after Kordell Stewart hit Michael Westbrook on a 27-yard touchdown with 7:54 remaining in the half. But for the next two full quarters it was all Michigan. Wolverine running back Tim Biakabutuka scored on a four yard run to pull UM to within 14-9 with 1:14 before halftime. Going for a two point conversion to pull the Wolverines to within a field goal of the Buffs, quarterback Todd Collins was intercepted by Buffs' linebacker Matt Russell, preserving a five point lead for Colorado.

 

 

The third quarter was a nightmare for the Buffs, as Michigan posted 17 unanswered points to take a 26-14 lead. Less than five minutes into the quarter, Tyrone Wheatley capped a 62-yard drive with a six yard scoring run. A short field goal after the Buffs' fumbled the kickoff return and a 65-yard bomb from Collins to receiver Amani Toomer gave the Wolverines their biggest advantage, 26-14, with just under three minutes remaining in the third. The Buffs were sluggish on offense, and the game appeared to be well in hand for the home team.

 

 

Now it was time for the Buffs to mount a comeback, but not before giving CU fans more reason to test their faith. After punting the ball away on its first four second half possessions (not including the James Kidd fumble after a Michigan kickoff), Colorado finally mounted a drive. Commencing with about eight minutes remaining in the game, Stewart methodically passed the Buffs down the field. After Stewart hit Michael Westbrook for nine yards down to the Michigan four yard line, the Buffs had a first-and-goal. Yes, CU was down 12 points, but now they were at point blank range, and still over five minutes remained on the game clock. Plenty of time for two scores and a victory.

 

 

Then the unthinkable happened. Stewart took off over the right end. Lunging for the goal line, Stewart lost possession of the ball. Stewart's fumble was recovered by Michigan, with the Wolverines given a touchback and the ball at their 20-yard line. To add insult to injury, an unsportsmanlike conduct penalty against CU gave the Wolverines the ball at their 35.

 

 

"What a crusher that is", said ABC play-by-play legend Keith Jackson. 5:08 remained, but the considered opinion of virtually everyone watching the game was that the Buffs' chances for a comeback had just been fumbled away.

 

 

But someone forgot to tell the Buffs, especially their defense. Three runs netted Michigan four yards, but cost CU two precious time outs in an effort to stop the clock. After a short punt return by Chris Hudson, CU had the ball at their own 28-yard line.

 

 

Now the fun would begin.

 

 

3:52 remaining - Michigan 26, Colorado 14 - Colorado ball at its own 28-yard line

 

After two scrambles and a fumbled pitch out of bounds by Stewart, Salaam cut up the left side for 12 yards and a first down to the Buffs' 48-yard line. "Make no mistake," said ABC commentator Bob Greise after Salaam's run. "There is plenty of time for the Buffaloes to score two touchdowns." A swing pass to Salaam gave the Buffs' another first down at the Michigan 40. Two passes to tight end Christian Fauria gave CU another first at the UM 24. 2:37 now remained in the contest. After an incomplete pass, Stewart kept the ball on an option to the left for 21 yards to the Michigan three. First and goal, Colorado.

 

 

"The only way to stop this team is if they stop themselves," noted Greise about the Buffs.

 

 

On the next play, a Kordell Stewart pass to the corner of the endzone intended for Michael Westbrook was too high, but Michigan had too many players on the field. The penalty moved the ball to the Michigan one yard line. A pitch to Salaam took care of the final yard. Neil Voskeritchian's kick was true, and the Buffs were back to within five points, 26-21.

 

 

The Buffs' subsequent onsides kick attempt was easily recovered by receiver Mercury Hayes, and it appeared that Colorado and its fans would spend much of the evening grousing about what could have been, and wondering how far the Buffs would fall in the polls the next morning.

 

2:16 remaining - Michigan 26, Colorado 21 - Michigan ball at the CU 45-yard line

 

 

All that remained for the Wolverines to do was to pick up one first down and end the game. On third and seven, the Buffs jumped offsides, giving Michigan an easier attempt at a game-ending first down. The Wolverines, however, responded in kind with a false start, moving the ball back. After some discussion, five precious seconds were returned to the stadium clock. A three-yard run by Biakabutuka into the line gave Michigan a fourth-and-four at the CU 39-yard line. Twenty one seconds remained. Chris Hudson called for a fair catch of the short punt at the CU 15-yard line.

 

 

:14 remaining - Michigan 26, Colorado 21 - CU ball at its own 15-yard line.

 

 

No real question about what had to happen now. Stewart dropped back, hitting Michael Westbrook for 21 yards to the CU 36-yard line. The game clock stopped automatically with the first down. The Buffs hurried up to the line of scrimmage, where Stewart immediately spiked the ball to stop the clock.

 

:06 remaining - Michigan 26, Colorado 21 - CU ball at its own 36-yard line

 

 

The 1994 College Football Play of the Year. One of the greatest single plays in college football history. After spiking the ball to stop the clock, Stewart jogged over towards the CU bench for the play call. He made it only half way before being waved back. "Jets, Rocket, Victory" was the play call. In CU football parlance, "Jets" refers to the receivers, "Rocket" means "go long". ("Victory" apparently means "I hope someone from our team catches the ball").Three receivers lined up on the left side, Westbrook, Rae Carruth, and Blake Anderson, while James Kidd lined up on the right.

 

 

"If I were the defense, I'd have a few more guys over there", said Bob Greise at the snap, referring to the lack of Michigan defensive backs at the line of scrimmage. Most of the Michigan secondary was already thirty yards downfield, awaiting the Stewart bomb.

 

 

Dancing behind the line of scrimmage long enough for his receivers to get downfield, Stewart launched the ball from his own 27-yard line. The moment was played out before over 100,000 in attendance, and millions on television. ABC's Keith Jackson, everyone's favorite play-by-play man, captured the moment:

"Stewart, with time," called Jackson.

 

 

"Let's it go ...

 

 

"He's got three people down there ...

 

 

"The ball's up in the air ...

 

 

"CAUGHT! TOUCHDOWN!! CAUGHT BY WESTBROOK FOR A TOUCHDOWN!!!

 

 

"INCREDIBLE!!!!"

 

 

A few moments passed. Shock was quickly replaced by the reality of the play, as Jackson regained control. "There is no time remaining," noted Jackson as the television screen alternated between CU players' jubilation and Michigan players' disbelief. "There are no flags on the field. Only despair for the maize and blue."

 

 

Colorado 27, Michigan 26.

 

CU/Michigan Post Game

 

 

"I don't care what anyone says", said Christian Fauria in the post-game celebration. "That was divine intervention." There were six Michigan defenders back when CU receiver Blake Anderson jumped up for the ball with Michigan free safety Chuck Winters. The ball was tipped back up into the air before falling into the waiting arms of Michael Westbrook. "The ball hit my hand," said Winters. "I definitely hit it", said Anderson, the son of former CU and NFL great Dick Anderson. "Westbrook was behind me. That's a designated play. I just went up and tipped it."

 

 

Colorado head coach Bill McCartney didn't belief that Stewart's pass would even travel as far as the end zone. "I was watching our receivers", said McCartney. "hoping for a penalty. I thought we needed some more yards."

 

 

As for Stewart, who rated the play's chances at "Fifty-fifty", was seventy yards away when the ball returned to earth. "All I saw was this big muscular arm hit the ball, and then I saw somebody fall down, and then I heard the crowd get quiet, and it looked like a big old truck just swept our whole sideline onto the field." Stewart, who on the play became Colorado's all-time career touchdown pass leader, "tried to yell" as he ran down the field, "but my Adam's apple kept coming up in my throat."

 

"IN-CREDIBLE!!!!"

 

 

Yelling was not a problem in Bozeman, Montana. I did not hear Keith Jackson's words after the tipped ball fell into Westbrook's arms as I was too busy yelling myself. At the time, my yells were heard as far away as Grand Junction, Colorado. Not because my screams could be heard 500 miles away, but because I was on the phone with Brad G. at the time.

 

 

I do not remember who called who, but I do remember Brad and I commiserating on the phone as the final moments unfolded. The call was made after the Stewart fumble, when it appeared the game had been lost. It continued as the Buffs slowly crawled back into contention, and was silent as we waited for the final gun

 

 

"Last play", we noted, fully expecting to get back to our dissection of the loss a few seconds later. Four turnovers and 102 yards in penalties had doomed the Buffs. Or so we had thought.

When Westbrook came down with the ball, I screamed at Brad, I screamed at the television. Even my wife, Lee, who was watching the game with me (albeit impatiently - the game was running long, and we were late for a party), started screaming. It was unbelievable. CU was back in the National Championship hunt!

I watched the video from the game over and over again, relishing the final play. I guess you could say that I may have watched it too many times, as several months later, during halftime of our Super Bowl party, I brought out the tape to show our guests. The worn tape broke. (Fortunately, the tear came during the portion of the tape showing Michigan's punt with 21 seconds remaining. The important portion of the tape was preserved!).

No rest for the weary. CU was 3-0, up to #5 in the polls, and the talk of the nation. But the Texas Longhorns, 3-0 and ranked 16th, wanted their own share of the nation's attention. The Buffs only had seven days to celebrate, recuperate, and prepare for the showdown in Austin.

The Buffs would go on to post a 11-1 record in Bill McCartney's final season, falling only to Nebraska.  Colorado completed its season ranked third after defeating Notre Dame, 45-24, in the Fiesta Bowl.

[More archived games are available at www.cuatthegame.com Please check out the site at your leisure, and let me know which games you would like to see posted.]

College Football: Predicting the 2008 FCS Upsets, Part II

Jun 18, 2008

FCS Week rolls on with Part Two of my series on the potential FCS (Division 1-AA) over FBS (Division 1-A) upsets of 2008. Here are my seventh through fifth most likely upsets.

7. South Dakota State at Iowa State (Aug. 28)

Iowa State struggled tremendously in their first year under former Texas defensive coordinator Gene Chizik, going only 3-9 despite having a veteran quarterback in Brett Meyer back.

Chizik’s team did show improvement down the stretch, as they won two out of their last three games against Big 12 competition, including a stunning 31-28 upset over Colorado.

Nevertheless, they lose a four-year starter at quarterback in Brett Meyer, as well as big play wide receiver Todd Blyth, who moves on after becoming Iowa State’s all-time leading receiver. The Cyclones do 14 fourteen starters for 2008, including their three top rushers from 2007 and four starting offensive lineman.

However, this was an offense that averaged a paltry 18.2 points per game, and was held under 20 points per game on eight separate occasions last season (including games against Kent State and Northern Iowa).

Chizik is a great defensive mind, but he’s never had to gameplan for an FCS team with the kind of talent he had at Auburn and Texas, so it was no surprise that his Cyclones fell to Northern Iowa in week two last season.

While he has seven starters back to work with, he loses his two best assets in linebackers Alvin Bowen and Jon Banks, and with them the heart and soul of his defense. He’ll need more than scheme if he’s going to stop South Dakota State’s offense; he’s going to need to inspire effort and intensity.

South Dakota State won the Gateway Conference in their first year of conference competition last season and finished the year ranked 19th in the country after pulling off an upset of powerhouse North Dakota State in the finale.

South Dakota State loses a number of key players off of the offense and the defense but does return their starting quarterback Ryan Berry, who came on strong after a shaky opening to the 2007 season.

The Jackrabbits have a core group of underrated skill position players, including receiver JaRon Harris, who is widely considered one of the best “small school” draft prospects in the country.

I’m also very high on running back Kyle Minett, who excelled during spot duty for departing senior Cory Koening last season. Major losses from the defensive side of the football could hurt the Jackrabbits, but that’s assuming Iowa State’s Austen Arnaud and company are in a position to strike early and often (a big “if” at this point)

One thing I look for when predicting upsets are FCS teams that have a mentality of winning and FBS teams which have struggled against FCS competition in recent years.

This matchup is clearly a case, of both as South Dakota State comes off of a 7-4 season and a 4-0 record in conference play while Iowa State is coming off of a 24-13 loss to Northern Iowa last season and a 3-9 record.

South Dakota State’s main problem over the last few seasons has been inconsistent quarterback play, but with Ryan Berry coming back they should be able to more easily disseminate the ball to their playmakers, including potential NFL prospect JaRon Harris.

I think Chizik will have Iowa State headed in the right direction sooner rather than later, but he’s just not an offensive mind, and considering just how poorly Iowa State’s offense started last season (not to mention a new quarterback replacing a four-year starter) there isn’t precedence for Iowa State to score many points against even a rebuilding South Dakota State defense.

South Dakota State is a talented FCS team, and after a strong finish last year I give the Jackrabbits a decent shot at knocking at an Iowa State team which is undergoing an identity change.

6. McNeese State at North Carolina (Aug. 30)

Year one under former Miami (Fla.) National Championship Head Coach Butch Davis saw its ups and downs in Chapel Hill, as the North Carolina Tar Heels played a fairly competitive but uninspiring 4-8 season. 

The Tar Heels managed to take down Davis’ old team in Miami, as well as play fairly competitive games against Virginia Tech and South Carolina. However, as is the case with many of the teams in our countdown were plagued by inconsistent quarterback play.

T.J. Yates did an admirable job coming in as a redshirt freshman but his 18 picks went a long way towards North Carolina’s minus-6 turnover ratio, while the Tar Heel offense amassed a rather mundane 21.2 points per game during the 2007 campaign.

With 10 starters back, they should be improved in 2008, but they’re going to have to rely more on the running game with continued questions at quarterback.  

It was a record setting year in 2007 for the McNeese State Cowboys, who went undefeated in the regular season en route to an 11-1 season and an FCS playoff appearance (The Cowboys lost to Eastern Washington in the first round).

Like many teams in the countdown the Cowboys defeated a FBS program last season, amassing more than 400 total yards in a 38-17 win at Louisiana-Lafayette last season.

McNeese returns 12 returning starters overall in 2008, including an amazing seven players to earn either First or Second team All-Conference honors.

Quarterback Derrick Forroux is one of the best dual-threat quarterbacks in the FCS, throwing for over 2000 yards in 2007 and rushing for over 500. Four offensive linemen return (two All-Conference), as does a veteran group of skill positions players, including playmaking wide receiver Steven Whitehead, who sat out last season with an injury.

This offense put up more than 450 total yards against ULL last season, and with their top players back, should find similar success against North Carolina.

Butch Davis may have North Carolina well on its way to becoming a force to reckoned with in the ACC, but coming off of a 4-8 season, the Tar Heels are more likely another year or two away, even with 18 returning starters in 2008.

It’s never easy opening the season against a good FCS team like McNeese State, and considering the fact that Yates missed the spring and is coming off shoulder surgery, you almost have to expect some rust from the Tar Heel offense.

McNeese State has an “expect to win” attitude under Head Coach Matt Viator that has manifested itself in a 17-3 record over the past two seasons. I like the fact that McNeese State has an experienced quarterback and offensive line, not to mention speed and athleticism at the skill positions.

North Carolina’s otherwise solid defense struggled against mobile quarterbacks last year, and one factor we’ve seen throughout most FCS upsets is the ability of a mobile quarterback to break down even good FBS defenses.

I could see North Carolina having a winning season in 2007, but their Aug. 30 matchup with McNeese State is by no means a “warmup” game, which I fear the Tar Heels will treat it as before preparing for a Thursday night matchup with Rutgers in Week Three.

#5: James Madison at Duke (Aug 30)

Duke University’s football shortcomings are well documented, but just in case you’ve been living under a rock since 1960, I’ll gladly go through them with you.

Duke has had three winning seasons in the last 45 years, two of them under Spurrier. The Blue Devils have a grand total of 10 wins over the past eight years, including an 0-12 performance in 2006.

Quite simply, Duke has been the punching bag of not just the ACC, but of the entire college football community. Things could change sooner rather than later however for the Blue Devils, as famed offensive mind David Cutcliffe comes in to take charge of a program which has more potential than most people realize.

He comes in at the right time too, as Duke returns 17 starters, including all of last year’s major statistical leaders. QB Thaddeus Lewis showed outstanding development last year from a woeful 2006, and should thrive under Cutcliffe’s tutelage, as should an up-and-coming group of receivers like potential All-ACC performer Eron Riley.

The offensive line is a constant concern however, as last year’s group (which also happened to be the entire 2006 group) allowed 45 sacks.

This year, they have to replace two starters, although the Blue Devils do get 10 back on defense, including a massive front four featuring DT Vince Oghobasse (6-foot-6, 310).

James Madison is a traditional FCS power which is usually competitive with FBS teams, including many from the Atlantic Coast conference. They did lose their opener to North Carolina last year, but held the Tar Heels to a paltry 2.9 yards per carry on the ground.

The Dukes are coming off an impressive 8-4 season in which their only FCS losses came to playoff bound teams (Richmond, Delaware, Appalachian State.) JMU lost those three games by a combined five points and should have beaten National Champion Appalachian State had it not been for a series of unfortunate events late in the game which sparked the Mountaineers to victory.

This year, James Madison returns a veteran squad of 15 returning starters including dual-threat quarterback Rodney Landers, who rushed and passed for over 1,000 yards last year.

The Dukes also welcome back four starting offensive lineman from a unit which allowed the fewest sacks in FCS play, to go along with two veteran tailbacks in Eugene Holloman (1085 yards in 2006) and Griff Yancy (688 yards, 6.3 average last year).

While they lose veteran safety Tony LeZotte on defense, JMU is still in relatively good shape, returning three starters from last year’s unit.  I like the way JMU matches up with Duke, which has traditionally struggled with rushing defense and rushing offense over the last few seasons.

Don’t get me wrong, Duke is definitely a team on their way up and, from a talent perspective, is much better than the vast majority of college football fans realize. But JMU is a talented and experienced FCS team with an “expect to win” mindset that doesn’t get left on the bus when they play FBS teams.

Duke dropped their 2006 opener to Richmond and likely will need some time to adjust to Cutliffe’s offense, which will demand more on Duke’s experienced but problem-ridden offensive line. Believe it or not, I think that Duke could be overconfident coming into this game, as the Blue Devils will be facing the prospect of four winnable home games right out of the starting gate.

One thing when dealing with traditional losing teams like Duke is that they tend to under-perform in new situations, and even though they may very well come out firing during the opening part of the season, they’ll have to deal with a brand-new monster; expectations.

Considering JMU’s proven offensive formula and some close losses to FCS superpowers last season this game looks like a legitimate toss-up.

We’re almost there! Expect my most likely FCS over FBS upsets by Friday!

Colorado Football: Father's Day Update

Jun 17, 2008

Stuart Whitehair provides us with a Father's Day Update from his blog cuatthegame.com (posted June 15, 2008):

Contract extension for Dan Hawkins

Colorado head coach Dan Hawkins received a contract extension at the CU Board of Regents meeting June 4th.  The unanimous vote of the Regents gives the Buffs’ football coach a contract through the 2012 season.

For head coach Dan Hawkins, the extension adds two years to his first contract with Colorado.  The guaranteed money was not significantly raised—up $44,500 per season to around $900,000.

Much of the increase in salary comes in incentive bonus money.  Previously, Hawkins was eligible for $50,000 for such incentives as student citizenship, community outreach, and academic progress.  The bonus money for reaching those incentives has been raised to $77,500 each.

In his first two seasons, Hawkins met 95% of these incentives.

Other bonuses, to be awarded for meeting goals nationally and within the Big 12 conference, as well as for achieving individual goals (such as Big 12 Coach of the Year), have also been significantly raised.

“I am honored that the university feels good about what we are doing here,” said Hawkins of his extension.  “I am proud of the efforts we have put forth and glad they have the confidence in us that we are doing the right things on and off the field, and they want us to stay here.”

Hawkins also discussed his interest in increasing salaries for his assistant coaches, commenting, “It is not just the head coach.  You have got to have great people.”

While I am glad that the contract extension was accomplished with little fanfare and little opposition, I am not sure that it was necessary just yet.  Hawkins noted in his interview that, as he still had three years remaining on his original contract, opponents were not yet using the length of his contract as a negative on the recruiting trail.

Plus, the assistant coaches at CU are currently not that far off the pace of their Big 12 counterparts.  Why not wait until the end of the 2008 season, hopefully on the heels of a winning season, to announce the extension?  What if the Buffs have a third consecutive losing season in 2008?

How much hand-wringing will there be if the program, already posting the worst consecutive seasons since the dark days of the early 1980s, fails to make headway against the ever-improving competition in the conference, and yet has a coach who still has four years remaining on his contract?

Okay, enough of the negative.  Even if the Buffs are around .500 in 2008, I am very optimistic about the future.  The schedules in the next few years are not as daunting, and the accumulation of talent in Boulder is undeniable.

Hopefully, we will look back at this extension with the same fondness and admiration as we do the extension granted to Bill McCartney by athletic director Bill Marolt in 1984.  With the head coach at CU in the midst of his third straight losing campaign (and what would become a 1-10 record that season), Marolt extended the contract of his football coach.

At the time, the McCartney extension was perceived as being, at best, a questionable move.  In hindsight, it was a prescient move which allowed McCartney to build a national champion.

June 4, 2008—prelude to a championship?

Compare the situation in Boulder to that of Manhattan, Kansas.  Hawkins at Colorado and Ron Prince at Kansas State are both entering their third seasons.  Both have been to one bowl game in their first two campaigns.  One has an 8-17 cumulative record, the other 12-13.

Only one, though, is on the “hot seat,” according to most pundits.

Of course it is the coach with the better record: Ron Prince of Kansas State.

Why so?  Prince posted a 7-6 record in his first season, including a bowl bid, before dipping to a 5-7 record in 2007.  Still, Prince is considered to be in a pivotal year at the same time Hawkins is signing an extension.

Three factors are at work here.  First, there is how the 2007 season ended for the Wildcats.  After a 5-3 start, Kansas State lost its last four games, including a 73-31 rout by a mediocre Nebraska team and a 49-25 trouncing by Fresno State with a bowl game on the line.

Quite simply, there has been a sour taste in the mouths of the K-State faithful since December, and there have been few positive stories for the program to tout since then.

Second, there is the recruiting class of 2008.  An astounding 20 of 34 recruits in the third class signed by Ron Prince were junior college recruits.  Even for a program which has a reputation for signing players from two-year schools, this is a huge number (the remaining teams in the Big 12, for example, picked up 26 junior college players in 2008—combined).

Such drastic measures are not uncommon for a first-year coach, but for a coach in his third season, the move smacks of desperation.

Perhaps, then, the difference in moods in the two camps is all about perception.  The Buffs under Hawkins moved forward in 2007, improving four wins over the 2006 debacle.  While there is much to be proven, both on and off the field, before CU fans can count on January bowls on a regular basis, the perception is that Colorado is putting the pieces in place for a run of success.

At the same time, the prevailing perception about Kansas State is that the Wildcat program is stepping back—that Ron Prince and KSU are making moves out of a need to try and win now (witness the recruiting class and the dumping of Fresno State on the 2008 schedule).

We will have to wait and see.  Kansas State will likely open 3-1, or perhaps 4-0 in 2008 (Louisville being the only question mark), while the Buffs, with West Virginia at home and Florida State on the road, may open 2-2.  Heading into Big 12 play, Prince could have an overall record of 16-13, while Hawkins could be 10-19.

We will see…

Schedule changes

Colorado recently agreed to a three-game series with Fresno State, with games to be played in 2011 (Boulder), 2012 (at Fresno), and 2013 (Boulder). The announcement of the three-game series with FSU came as Colorado and LSU postponed their two-game set scheduled for 2011 and 2012.

There was no penalty for CU in exchanging Tigers for Bulldogs, as the LSU home-and-home contract, first announced in 2006, was never signed.  Dave Plati, CU associate athletic director for sports information, stressed that the LSU deal was not cancelled, but postponed.

Colorado is looking for a new deal with LSU for 2020 and 2021, but LSU is only scheduling out as far as 2018.  “They are not scheduling out as far as we are,” said Plati.  “So we will probably come back and revisit that at some point.”

Colorado is 4-1 all-time against Fresno State from the Western Athletic Conference, with four of the five games being played in Boulder.  The one loss was a memorable one, as the Buffs lost to the Bulldogs, 24-22, in the 2001 season opener (anyone want to relive the Craig Ochs interception with three minutes to play on a third-and-goal at the Fresno State two-yard line?).

The opening loss in the Jim Thorpe Classic ultimately cost Colorado a chance at playing Miami in the Rose Bowl for the national championship.  The Buffs finished the regular season 10-2, completing the 2001 season with a 62-36 romp over Nebraska and a revenge win over Texas in the Big 12 title game, but were denied a title shot by a few decimal points in a computer.

Granted, there is no way of knowing how the CU season would have unfolded had the Buffs defeated Fresno State, 25-24, in the opener, but the effect of the loss is a question which will be discussed again—starting in September 2011.

The internet has been ablaze with comments about the Fresno State contract.  For the most part, the sentiment has been that the Buffs are “dumbing down” the schedule in trading Fresno State for defending national champion LSU.

Several issues here.  First, as noted above and in all of the media stories about the games, CU did not “trade” Fresno State for LSU.  The LSU contract was never signed, and, if Buff officials are to be believed, games with the Tigers will be discussed again in the future.

Second, there is no guarantee as to where these three programs will be in three seasons.  Yes, it is likely that LSU will continue to be a national power, and yes, it is true that the Fresno State Bulldogs, from a non-BCS conference, will continue to be, at best, a thorn in the side of those BCS schools willing to face them (paging Kansas State…).

Colorado, for its part, may be a national power in 2011, 2012, and 2013, or may be a mediocre team looking for a way to find its way to six regular season wins and a minor bowl.  Contracts are often signed far in advance—so who knows how this development will affect the future of the CU program?

Who would have thought years ago that the West Virginia game in 2007 would be against a top-10 team (which, by the way, was supposed to be against North Carolina before the Tar Heels backed out of the home-and-home with the Buffs), while the Florida State game would be against a struggling team?

Finally, if you have any friends who still give you grief about the Buffs ducking the Tigers in order to get out of a tough series, do not back down.  Colorado has to apologize to no one when it comes to non-conference scheduling.

Try this stat on any CU detractors you encounter: Colorado has played 27 games against ranked non-conference opponents (not counting bowls) since 1990, the most in the Big 12.

The other five teams in the Big 12 North, over that same period of time? 42 games—combined!  Nebraska is a distant second to the Buffs, with 14 such contests, and no other team in the Big 12 North has hit double digits.

Another interesting stat—as noted above, CU was supposed to play North Carolina in a home-and-home in 2008 and 2009, but the Tar Heels backed out last spring, and the Buffs picked up West Virginia as our new opponent.

West Virginia, in addition to being a top-10 team with a Heisman trophy candidate at quarterback, has a .742 winning percentage away from home the past five seasons, fifth-best mark in the nation.

North Carolina, meanwhile, is coming off of a 4-8 season (two wins coming over James Madison and Duke—in overtime) and has lost 21 consecutive games outside of the state of North Carolina (dating back to 2002).  If Colorado was interested in “ducking” opponents, why did Colorado choose West Virginia last year as a new opponent?

Try that one on any detractors.

New Recruits

Colorado picked up its first two recruits on June 6.  The first is quarterback Jordan Wynn from Oceanside, California.  Wynn is considered a three-star prospect by Scout.com and the 54th-best quarterback in the nation.  In his junior season, Wynn led his hometown team to the California state championship in its class.

Jarrod Darden, meanwhile, is a three-star wide receiver prospect from Keller, Texas.  Darden is considered the 90th-best wide receiver in the nation.  Darden received offers from a number of BCS conference teams, including Big 12 rivals Missouri and Texas Tech.

Are these Darrell Scott type announcements?  No.  But here is some food for thought.  Last year, when Dan Hawkins and his staff put together a top-20 recruiting class, there were only three commitments in June.  The only verbal commitments received prior to August last year?  Quarterback Tyler Hansen and safeties Patrick Mahnke and Vince Ewing.

What do these three players have in common?  They were the lowest rated players on the Colorado board in February.  None were top 100 candidates at their positions, and all were considered two-star prospects.

Lesson: The 2008 class only got better as time went on; no reason to believe the 2009 class will not do the same.

The other tidbit: Both of the new recruits are three-star prospects.  Other Big 12 North schools have received more verbal commitments, but that does not mean that the Buffs are behind.

According to Scout.com, Missouri has eight commitments already.  Yes, two are four-star prospects.  On the other hand, three of the Tiger prospects are considered one-star recruits (average for the eight: 2.5 stars).

Same story at Nebraska (five verbals, including two three-stars and three one-stars) and Kansas (three verbals—one three-star and two one-stars).  Kansas State and Iowa State, according to Scout.com, have yet to receive a verbal commitment for 2009.

So if you talk to fellow Buff supporters, and they are expressing concern about how slowly the 2009 class is coming together, just give them a wry smile, and tell them not to worry.

Hawkins and his crew have things well in hand.

Stadium rights

Also in the news recently was the announcement at the Board of Regents meeting that Colorado is looking into selling the naming rights to Folsom Field.  The deal, for which no buyer has been identified, would be a 15-20 year contract which could mean $15 million for the school.

Chancellor G.P. “Bud” Peterson was quick to state that keeping the name “Folsom Field” would have to be part of any negotiation.  “We would retain Folsom Field as part of the name,” said Peterson.  “We have had no discussions about changing it.  It has historical significance, and it would be, I think, a huge mistake for us to consider doing something like that.”

“Welcome to our telecast of Colorado/West Virginia, coming to you live from Folsom Field at Celestial Seasonings Stadium...”

What do you think?  Like most Buff fans, I have mixed emotions.  While we have had the Coors Event Center on campus for a generation, it still seems odd to think about slapping a different name on Folsom Field.

Still, I do understand and appreciate the realities of the college football world.  Quite simply, there are the kings and the peasants, and it is not difficult to identify which is which.

Colorado has always been on the fringe of royalty, not quite amongst the elite of college football.  While football revenue generated at Colorado is a joke to Nebraska, it is an unobtainable goal to Colorado State.

The Buffs can either play in this high stakes game, and seek new revenue sources whenever and wherever they present themselves, or they can concede the field and wallow along with Iowa State and Baylor at the shallow end of the BCS world.

I am hoping that if a donor is found, it will be an easy name for us to swallow.  “Invesco Field” is bland enough that everyone still refers to the home of the Broncos as Mile High Stadium.  “Heinz Field” in Pittsburgh generates jokes, and do not ask anyone in Houston about “Enron Field.”

What say we find ask everyone in attendance at the Texas game for a donation of $300, giving CU $15 million to work with—and then give Folsom Field a corporate name we can all enjoy:

“Welcome to our telecast of Colorado/West Virginia, coming to you live from THE SINK…”

For more on the CU Buffs, log onto www.cuatthegame.com  comments and suggestions welcome!

CU at the Game - June update posted!

Jun 5, 2008

Greetings, Buff fans!
 
Just when you thought it was safe to go back into the water, along comes an update from www.cuatthegame.com
 
Three columns have been posted under "Random Summer Thoughts" (you’ll need to scroll down a bit on the front page to get there—I have left the spring practice information up on the site.  DisclaimerI've been having some difficulty with the site—there are some inadvertent "A's" and "ae's" where apostrophe's and other punctuation marks are supposed to be.  I apologize in advance for any difficulties in reading through the new postings).
 
Included in the update:
 
1) Updates on linebacker Derrick Stephens and left tackle Daron Rose. Don’t know how these two players fit into your fall plans to watch the Buffs? You’ll have to go to the site and read up.
 
2) Two recommendations for your summer reading list. One book is all about CU football and is by the guru of CU football, Dave Plati. It comes out the end of June and is a "must-have" for every Buff fan. The other book I think you’ll enjoy never mentions the Buffs (or college football for that matter). It is almost 20 years old and is the autobiography of an English football, aka soccer, fan. Still, the book is about what it means to be a devoted fan, and the author eloquently captures what we—the diehard fans—are all about.
 
3) Predicting the predictions. June for college football fans is all about the preseason magazines. Soon Athlon, Lindy’s, Street and Smith’s, and the like will be hitting the newsstands (some are already being posted on the internet) Too busy to read up on all the predictions? Wondering which teams from the Big 12 North will appear in the top 25 polls? Which ones will be considered "locks" for bowl games? Check out www.cuatthegame.com, and I’ll summarize what the magazines will be telling us this summer.
 
But wait, there’s more: If you have yet to become an aficionado of the "Archive Game of the Week" section, now is your chance. Posted this week is the 1991 Orange Bowl. The final score: Colorado 10, Notre Dame 9, belies the drama leading up to, during, and after the game. Remember actually rooting for Notre Dame to beat Penn State (only to be disappointed)? Remember Ronnie Bradford? "The Clip"? The one point loss in the UPI poll?
 
Take a few minutes to revisit the notes, quotes, and stats of the game which gave CU its first national football championship.


I’ll be back with you with another post in July. Until then, please remember that referrals are most welcome. We have added 75 to the email update list since January (welcome all you recruiting and spring practice fans!).

There will be a first-ever (likely to become annual) www.cuatthegame.com tailgate party at Invesco Field for the CSU game August 31. A special invitation will be sent out to all those on the email update list, so forward this post to your fellow Buffs!

Go Buffs!   Stuart

Qualk Talk: Week Seven College FB Matchups

Oct 12, 2007

Icon Sports MediaAfter Stanford beat USC last week, I was dumbfounded.

The press box at Clemson was a semi-jubilant place—even after a disappointing Tigers loss—simply because the Trojans went down to the seemingly awful Stanford Cardinal.

I have no idea what's going on in college football these days, but the fan in me is loving every minute of it.

Sure, the upsets have created a Top 25 that would make any old-school purist vomit. And if you're one who loves to look at matchups and predict games (which I am), you're experiencing disappointment after costly disappointment.

The new college football landscape—in which any team that goes undefeated has the focus of David (you know, the guy from The Bible) and enough talent to beat at least half the teams in the NFL—has inspired me to start a new weekly feature on five teams that should be on upset alert.

(NOTE: Due to some technical difficulties, this column did not get published this week. Look for it next week.)

For now, let's take a look at the matchups that could shape some of Saturday's action...

Icon Sports MediaTexas' Offense vs. Iowa State Head Coach Gene Chizik

You may be asking, "What in the world is this all about?"

Yes, Iowa State lost to the FCS's Northern Iowa, and has been unable to do just about anything on the field for much of the year.

But watch out for this game.

Mack Brown's offense is reeling. Colt McCoy is either going through his sophomore slump or is really bad at leading his football team.

If that weren't bad enough, McCoy's top target, Limas Sweed, has been informed that his Longhorn career could be over after breaking his wrist.

And who knows this UT team better than its former co-defensive coordinator?

Chizik could benefit from my "Chuck Amato Theory": When a head coach faces the team for which he used to be an assistant, regardless of the talent of the two teams, the coach will win at least half of the time.

This theory has saved Amato's job for about three years, as he repeatedly beat Florida State with less talent.

Texas has lost four-straight conference games and is 0-2 in the Big 12—its worst start in over 50 years. The lack of leadership and character are beginning to show, both on the field and in the police blotter.

Don't be surprised if Chizik's ability to figure out the Longhorns pays off as the Cyclones sneak up on Texas.

Icon Sports MediaKentucky's Andre Woodson vs. LSU's Defense

What a battle of titans! This should be fun to watch.

LSU is first in total defense and second in scoring defense. That's the bottom line: They've shut down everybody and will continue to do so.

Woodson is, by far, the best quarterback to face the vaunted Tigers' D.  And although his team has now lost a game—and may continue to lose due to their defensive deficiencies—he's still a Heisman candidate.

Woodson is second in the SEC in passing efficiency and passing yards per game.

This matchup could be affected by the status of Rafael Little, who's listed as questionable with a thigh injury. Without his top rusher, Woodson may have to throw a little more than usual—which should make LSU's job a little easier.

Wisconsin's PJ Hill vs. Penn State's Front Seven

PJ Hill will have to carry a Badger team that's coming off of its first defeat in over a year. The loss of top receiver Luke Swan has put more of the offensive load—both running the ball and catching passes—on Hill's shoulders.

Not that Hill can't take it all. He's ninth in the nation in rushing yards per game, gaining 125 on average. At the very least, he should be able to control the clock with his punishing style.

He will face a Penn State defense that ranks eighth nationally in rush defense, allowing only 80.5 yards per game on the ground. The Nittany Lions have been good defensively all year long, and facing a shaken Wisconsin team should pad those stats a little bit.

Icon Sports MediaMissouri's Chase Daniel vs. Oklahoma's Defense

Chase Daniel has been sensational, phenomenal, nasty so far.

He's had the quietest great start ever, but that could change with a good performance against an underrated Oklahoma D.

Daniel is third in the country in total offense—gaining about 380 yards per game—and is as much a threat with his feet as he is with his arm. A current Heisman dark horse, Daniel will look to continue his hot play by keeping the OU linebackers honest.

While Sam Bradford and the Sooner offense have garnered all the headlines thus far, the Sooner defense has been incredible as well. They're currently 11th in America in total defense—fifth against the run—and should make life difficult for a Missouri team that seems to shrink in the spotlight.

Arkansas' Casey Dick vs. Auburn's Secondary

We all know that Darren McFadden will do his thing; nobody will be able to stop him from putting up insane stats (again) this weekend.

The real key for Arkansas will be Casey Dick's ability to complete short and intermediate passes and manage the game. The Razorbacks are the 106th-ranked passing team in the country, so it hasn't been a tough decision for opposing defenses to put eight or nine guys in the box to try to slow down McFadden and Felix Jones.

Auburn is 14th in total defense, with fairly similar averages against the run and the pass. In other words, they're able to take away whatever they have to, which could spell trouble for Dick and the Razorbacks.

Iowa State-Texas Tech: New-Look Cyclones Need a Win

Oct 4, 2007

IconThe Iowa State Cyclones make the trip to Lubbock, Texas, hungry for a win.

On the season, ISU sports a 1-4 record under new head coach Gene Chizik. Iowa State’s offensive statistics are less than stellar, but that won’t stop the Cyclones from giving a great effort on the road in a pivotal conference matchup.

Iowa State Offensive Notes

-Senior QB Bret Meyer leads the Iowa State offense. On the season, Meyer is 112 for 179, a 62.6 completion percentage. He’s thrown for 1,092 yards (6.1 yards per attempt) with 4 TDs and 8 INTs.

-The Cyclones’ rushing leader is Jamicah Bass, who has 96 carries for 380 yards (4.1 yards per carry with 4 TDs).

Bass was held out of last week’s game, and Jason Scales played in his place. Scales has 115 yards on 31 carries with 2 TDs. That’s 3.7 yards per carry.

Bass is expected to play this week, but no official announcement has been made.

QB Meyer has 195 yards on 51 totes (3.8 yards per carry) with 1 TD.

-The Cyclones’ leading receiver is once again Todd Blythe. The former ISU QB has 24 receptions on the year for 291 yards (12.1 yards per catch) and 2 TDs.

R.J. Sumrall is next with 28 catches for 277 yards (9.9 yards per catch). Derrick Catlett has 6 grabs for 26 yards and 1 TD. Wallace Franklin has 2 receptions for 5 yards and a TD.

Texas Tech Offensive Notes

-Where the Iowa State offense has struggled, Texas Tech has lit up opposing defenses in 2007. Graham Harrell, the nation’s leader in passing yards and passing TDs, directs coach Mike Leach’s aerial assault.

Harrell is 192-267 for 2,301 yards with 24 TDs and 2 INTs. That’s 8.6 yards per attempt and a 71.9 completion rate.

-Junior Shannon Woods paces the Red Raider’s running game. He has 43 rushes for 269 yards (6.3 yards per carry) with 7 TDs.

Kobey Lewis is next on the list with 27 carries for 95 yards and 2 TDs. Freshman Aaron Crawford has 19 carries for 58 yards.

As the season progresses, the Red Raiders are going to have to find a way to run the football. Eventually, Texas Tech will face a defense that is athletic enough to slow down the passing game.

-Redshirt freshman Michael Crabtree continues to lead Texas Tech (and the nation) in receiving. He has 60 catches for 920 yards (15.3 yards per catch) and 14 TDs.

Danny Amendola has recorded 44 catches for 593 yards (13.5 YPC) with 3 TDs. RB Shannon Woods has 22 catches for only 62 yards, but does have 2 TDs.

That’s not too good for last year’s Big 12 leader in all-purpose yardage—but Red Raider faithful have to believe that Woods will come through in the clutch.

Eric Morris has 21 catches for 215 yards with 3 TDs, and Grant Walker has hauled in 13 catches for 175 yards and 2 TDs. True freshman Detron Lewis has 2 grabs for 63 yards and 2 scores.

Intangibles

Iowa State is similar to Oklahoma State in that the Cyclones don’t match up very well with Texas Tech.

The Cyclones have lost to Kent State, Northern Iowa, Toledo, and Nebraska. In those games, their highest point total was 35, against Toledo.

ISU isn't good at creating turnovers, and they don't score quickly when they have the ball. Those are things Chizik's boys will have to do to stay within 30 points of Texas Tech.

However, ISU is hungry for a win—and the Red Raiders are well aware of how important each conference game is, especially with OU and UT both losing last Saturday.

This weekend's game is truly a clash of titans. Gene Chizik is regarded as one of the nation’s top defensive coaches—he directed back-to-back title-winning defenses at Auburn and Texas. On the other sideline, Mike Leach runs an offense that has mowed down opponents from California to Texas to Poland.

The edge goes to Leach and the Red Raiders this week. The game is at home for Texas Tech, and it will be difficult for ISU’s ball-control offense to keep pace with Harrell, Crabtree, and the rest of Tech’s game breakers.

If Chizik and the Cyclones can force mistakes by the Raiders, they have a fighting chance. If not, ISU could be making the flight back to Ames, Iowa sitting at 1-5...with a trip to Austin right around the corner.

Prediction

Texas Tech 59, Iowa State 24 

Big 12 North Preview: Huskers Back to Prominence?

Aug 27, 2007

Icon1. Nebraska

This is a very, very good football team. The return of Zack Bowman notwithstanding, this defense can be very, very good, sick good. It's not as deep as the Sooners, or LSU, or USC, but it's starting eleven will be as good as just about any in America. Bowman, when healthy, is one of the country's top cover men. His presence would do wonders as it would allow the Huskers to keep Courtney Grixby from starting and let him cover slot receivers in multiple receiver packages, which at his size, is more ideal for him. Andre Jones was the teams number two tackler a year ago from the other corner position, and his steady play should be enough to hold off Armando Murrillo, a JUCO transfer who will still be a key contributor. If Bowman can't go, Murrillo likely starts opposite Jones. If Bowman can go, the Huskers boast a trio of corners more than capable of matching up with the top receivers in the conference.

The defensive line is young, not a senior among them, but it's not at all short on talent. Ndamukong Suh, a sophomore, may become a household name by the end of the season. It would help though if Barry Turner shows the form he showed as a freshman. Zach Potter and Ty Steinkhuler haven't played too much in their first two years, but both juniors posses the ability to step in and be effective. One intriguing player is Clayton Seivers. He's been at tight end and linebacker, and now at defensive end. He's a good athlete who will likely find a way on the field in some capacity.

The only questions at linebacker is how to get everyone on the field. Bo Ruud, Corey McKeon, Steve Octavien and Phillip Dillard all boast All Star talent, so don't be surprised if the Huskers at times run a little 3-4 to take advantage of their abilities. Injuries have kept this group from reaching it's potential thus far, so it's a risky proposition to count on them for this year, but you just can't ignore the talent. Dillard will likely be the top backup at all three linebacker spots after missing all of last season with an injury. McKeon didn't approach his 98 tackle sophomore year and his tackles behind the line of scrimmage were cut in half last year thanks to constantly battling injuries. He's healthy, and so is Octavien. The one guy who has stayed healthy is Ruud who was first team all conference a year ago. Ruud possesses the ability to play the run, rush the passer, and drop back in coverage.

The offense again boasts a typical Nebraska line, something they haven't had in a while. They did allow 30 sacks a year ago, so the fact they have to replace both tackles may not be as startling as it would appear. Lydon Murtha will take over at one of those tackle spots and he's a guy that will likely be playing on Sundays in the near future. Who they are protecting is surprisingly still up in the air. Joe Ganz is apparently pushing Sam Keller for the job. Keller's physical ability has never been questioned, it's his mental aptitude and attitude that could be what ultimately derails what should have been a fantastic college career. He knows this is his last shot, so I expect him to hold on and keep the job. Ganz may have the edge in terms of familiarity with the system, Keller is the one with the edge talent wise, and ultimately the guy who is going to give this team a better shot at achieving it's lofty goals. If the Huskers just want to shoot for a Big 12 north crown, Ganz would do just fine, however, they want more. Either way, whoever wins the job will have plenty of talented wideouts to catch the ball, in fact, the Huskers probably have one of the top 20 receiving units in the nation. Wow, that just sounds funny. Maurice Purify, Terrence Nunn, Nate Swift and Frantz Hardy are all very capable receivers, so even with Purify's seemingly never ending off field problems they Huskers are set at this position, and these guys are all experienced too.

Their running situation reminds me of Penn State's, they need someone dependable to step up now that Kenny Wilson may miss the year. Marlon Lucky is the likely starter, he ran for over 700 yards last year. Cody Glenn is a bigger back, more of a power guy, and he tied for the team lead last year with 8 rushing touchdowns. Expect him to be the number one red-zone option. Freshman Marcus Mendoza likely would have redshirted, but because of the unknown status of Kenny Wilson, he may be pressed into duty. If Lucky can become a 1,000 yard back and Glenn can complement him in the red-zone and as a short yardage back it could complete this offense making them a legit contender to play for the national title.

The Huskers will look to find more big plays out of the return game, and Marcus Mendoza might be the answer. It's doubtful Lucky returns as the kick returner since he will be the starting running back. Then again, he didn't even average 20 yards a return last season, so it's probably not that big of a deal. Terrance Nunn and Courtney Grixby are the most likely of the veterans on this squad to return kicks and punts. Punter Dan Titchner put 26 of his 66 punts last year inside the 20, and his exceptional directional punting skills can put offenses in bad situations, which only makes an already tough defense even better. Finding a replacement for kicker Jordan Congdon will be a difficult task. Congdon only attempted 7 field goals last year, but hit 55 of 56 extra points last year which is an impressive feat. Adi Kunalic, a true freshman with a strong leg is the likely replacement at kicker.

If the Huskers find a way to win at Texas, they may be playing in the Big 12 title game with a shot at a rematch with USC. One possible pitfall though is a trip to Winston Salem that precedes their tilt with USC in Lincoln. If they overlook the Deacons there, their national title hopes will be smashed before the season really even begins. Beyond that, they get Oklahoma State and Texas A&M at home, where they are still 41-8 the past 7 years. The Huskers have also beaten Kansas State 18 of the last 19 at home, and while road trips to Missouri and Colorado seem to be dangerous, just keep in mind the Huskers seem to fare better against Colorado in Boulder than in Lincoln. However, they have lost their last two in Columbia, both by scores of 41-24. By October 6th, the Huskers will have either established themselves as the class of the North, and as a national title contender, or Bill Callahan will have a very, very hot seat, potentially opening the door for Kansas State and Missouri to win this division.


2. Kansas State

This may surprise some people, but I think the Wildcats are really primed to continue their upswing. Following 13 losses in 04 and 05 the Wildcats returned to the postseason a year ago with a turnover prone freshmen quarterback. That turnover prone freshmen quarterback is now a more seasoned sophomore with a spring practice under his belt. Freeman also has two talented backs lining up behind him and a legitimate receiving threat in Jordy Nelson. However, of some concern to Wildcat fans is Freeman's weight. He reported to camp overweight and out of shape, and even spent time some time working with the number three offense. However, there is no question that this team has to have Freeman to succeed. If it's any of the other quarterback options, the Wildcats won't be finishing this high.

Nelson's running mates from a year ago, Jermaine Moreira and Yamon Figurs though both depart so the need exists for a number two receiver to step up. That number two option could be tight end Rashaad Norwood who hauled in 35 passes a year ago and will probably be relied on even more this season. Also, they could line up tailback Leon Patton at receiver on occasion thanks to the presence of James Johnson. An intriguing candidate is Ernie Pierce who boasts excellent size. Ron Prince as gone the Bill Snyder approach with several JUCOs and Pierce is one who will have the chance to play right away, and so is Deon Murphy who is blessed with amazing speed. Freshman Lamark Brown, originally a defensive back, might wind up at receiver and he gives the team another big target.

In the backfield, sophomore Leon Patton ran for 609 yards and James Johnson logged 403. With their talent, they should improve over the rather paltry 115 yards per game they averaged a year ago on the ground. The offensive line won't dominate anyone, but it shouldn't hold this offense back, which had it's worst season, statistically, in years last year. The offensive line, coupled with a freshman quarterback, can be mostly to blame for their struggles a year ago. You can expect a big improvement over their 115 yards a game on the ground. If the Cats have another 4 games of rushing for less than 50 yards, something has gone seriously wrong. There is too much athleticism in the backfield for that to happen and they have three starters back on the offensive line, plus the addition of Alesana Alesana, a JUCO All American, at one of the tackle positions.

On defense the Cats began showing signs of getting back to their old Purple People eater ways, and while they won't be allowing 14 points a game or so this year, they won't be giving up the 30 they did in 04 and 05. They are switching to a 3-4, and how they handle that will determine the fate of this team. It's kind of odd they are switching to a 3-4 considering they lose their top two linebackers from a year ago, but they are high on the athleticism of the guys they've got stepping in. With a talented secondary though, look for a lot of aggressiveness out of the defense, and the 3-4 can provide some options for some different blitz packages which may make up for the lack of major talent at linebacker. Another key will be Alphonso Moran becoming a noseguard and facing likely double teams inside.  He's going to have to play well for this KSU defense to improve against the run, which after allowing 170 yards rushing or more 7 times last year. Personally I don't see the switch to a 3-4 being permanent. The personnel is better suited for a 4-3, and I think Ian Campbell, though undersized, is better suited at end, as he plays bigger than he is. Steven Cline started 7 games last year, but didn't make a whole lot of plays behind the line. However, at 290 lbs, he's the ideal size for a defensive end in a 3-4. On the other side though it will be interesting to see if Rob Jackson can handle playing in the 3-4. He's only 260 lbs, again, better suited for a 4-3, so it will be interesting to see if he can improve on an impressive 2006 season where he recorded 4.5 sacks and 36 tackles. After recording 40 sacks a year ago, the number could drop thanks to the change in philosophy.

Concerns obviously exist at linebacker. As mentioned, their top two are gone from 2006, and they don't have a senior among the replacements. Campbell will still be a force at one outside linebacker spot, and Antwon Moore flashed a lot of potential a year ago. One person who the 3-4 benefits is Moore who was a bit undersized at 5'10, 209 lbs. In the middle Reggie Walker and Ross Diehl appear to have the upper hand. Walker started 9 games last year, but he was nothing more than average last year. Unfortunately, the top choices behind him don't show much more potential. Diehl is talented, but entirely unproven. Don't be surprised if by the time the Big 12 schedule begins the Wildcats are back to a 4-3, at least more often.

Whatever they play in front of them, the Cats pass defense was decent last season, but not anything special. They do bring back three starters though, including sophomore Joshua Moore who became a starter at the close of the year as a true freshman and played extremely well. Justin McKinney made 54 tackles and had 8 passes defended last year. He and Moore team together to form a good duo who should help improve this team's pass defense. Byron Garvin and Bryan Baldwin are both experienced players with starting experience who provide depth to this unit. At safety Marcus Watts is one of the better safeties in the conference, and having him return healthy should further elevate the play of the secondary. JUCO transfer Gary Chandler will take over the other safety position. To me, the defense has the pieces to be pretty good, but it's though Tim Tibesar is trying to force these pieces together in a way that doesn't seem to fit.

As usual, the Wildcat return game was explosive last year, and Justin McKinney and Leon Patton both return. Both scored touchdowns on kick returns and averaged over 24 yards a return. With the new kickoff rules, it should make them even more dangerous. One of the two will likely return punts as well. Punter Tim Reyer returns, but they must find a new kicker. Jared Parker has been used on kickoffs the past two years and will get first crack at the place-kicking job. Brooks Rossman, a transfer from Ohio will also compete for the job, and so will senior Tim Schwendt, but Schwent lacks leg strength and Rossman lacks accuracy, so Parker appears to be lead man.

They only draw Texas (of the big three) from the north, and that, coupled with them hosting Missouri might give this Wildcat team the edge in the race for 2nd. Remember, untill last season, Missouri had lost 13 straight to Kansas State. The Cats are 6-2 at home in Big 12 games the past two seasons and each falls into a winnable category this year.


3. Missouri

If my prediction holds true, Gary Pinkel won't be here next year. Pinkel  is only two games above .500 for his career in Columbia and just 1-15 against the Top 25. In six years he's only won 9 road games, and I think only 5 or 6 road conference games. Offensively Missouri looks to be in good, no, make that, great shape. Tony Temple is one of the better backs most people don't know about, and they have some quality depth behind him. The offensive line is blessed with some high quality players as well. But as good as they hope the running game can be, we know what the key to the season is. Interestingly enough though, Missouri's late season swoon last year could be directly related to the running game disappearing. After going over 170 yards in 5 of their first 8 and getting off to a 7-1 start, they were held to 120 or less in each of their ensuing 4 losses and under 4.0 ypc.

Throwing the ball wasn't a problem last year, and the passing attack will be more dangerous with an even more experienced Chase Daniel back after throwing 3500 yards a year ago with 28 touchdowns and just ten interceptions. His two All American caliber tight ends are both back, and so is William Franklin who averaged over 17.0 ypc a year ago. Coffman and Rucker will pose matchup problems galore, often times forcing teams to use extra defensive backs, even when the Tigers only line up two receivers, which could really open up the running. If someone, and they expect it to be Tommy Saunders, becomes a reliable number two receiver this offense should eclipse the 30 points per game mark that has been the norm under Pinkel and likely approach 40. Another possibility though is Greg Bracey who runs a sub 4.3 40 and Jeremy Maclin who also runs a 4.3. The speed of these guys will simply make this offense that much more dangerous.

They might need the 40 though as this defense took bigger hits than people realize. Of their top seven tacklers from a year ago, only two return. Brock Christopher will do fine at middle linebacker, but they key to this defense will be him not just doing fine as he adjusts from playing outside to the inside, but excelling. He had 87 tackles a year ago, but interestingly, no sacks (though he did make 6.5 tackles for a loss). Christopher is strong pass coverage as well, but it will be interesting to see how he handles lead blocking fullbacks, and how he handles playing in traffic and not in as much space as he had on the outside. If Christopher can produce in the middle like he did on the outside they will hardly even feel the loss of Marcus Bacon and the two new starters at linebacker will reap the rewards. However, if Christopher struggles with the adjustment, the linebacker corps will probably be shuffled around quite a bit looking for the right combination. The coaches are confident in Christopher in the middle, but they are relying on a sophomore (Sean Weatherspoon) and a true freshman (Michael Keck) to replace Marcus Bacon and Dedrick Harrington who combined for 212 tackles, 8 passes defended, 6.5 sacks, and 3 interceptions. That's not exactly easy to just fill in the gaps. Plus, Keck is moving from defensive line to linebacker and making an adjustment. Another possibility is Van Alexander who has good size and speed. He was projected to start a year ago before getting hurt. Alexander possesses the athletic ability and size to play in the middle, and if he proves he can handle the middle, the Tigers might deploy him there, letting Christopher return to the outside. In any event, this unit alone might be the key to Missouri's whole season as it may dictate whether this defense is able to approach last year's success. If the linebackers play well, there's no reason it can't, and if the defense does come close to matching last year's numbers, this team has more than a decent shot at winning the division. However, there are questions at all three linebacker spots so it's a risky proposition.

Hardy Ricks and Darnell Terrell do make a fine cornerback duo, especially Terrell who will draw the opponent's top wideout. Both safeties have to be replaced though, and replacing Overstreet and his 90 plus tackles won't be easy, although William Moore shows a ton of promise. The defensive line should be strong in the middle as Ziggy Hood returns after getting 3 sacks in 3 games last year before bing injured and Lorenzo Williams recorded 6 sacks from his tackle position. The questions exist on the ends. Stryler Sulak could be ready for a breakout season, but they are going to need someone on the other side to adequately replace Xzavie Jackson. Last year's Tigers team was really good on defense, however, the trend the last couple of years has been boast a top notch defense one year, than suffer the next. If it holds true, this year's defense will struggle. Even if it performs well at the end of the year, it could struggle at the outset.

Missouri had some struggles on special teams a year ago, and they haven't returned a kickoff for a score since 1982. Marcus Woods, who averaged nearly 27 yards a return in 2005, but his injuries greatly limited his effectiveness a year ago. There are questions as to how much he will even play this year. Earl Goldsmith was okay on kick returns last season, but the Tigers would like someone with more big play capability back there, and that would have been a healthy Woods. Maclin or Bracey might get the opportunity, as well as Trenile Washington. Tommy Saunders was a solid option on punt returns and will likely reassume that role this fall. The Tigers biggest problem though was the punting game, which hurt them in the field position battle all year. Adam Crosslett's performance on the field has steadily declined, to the point the Tigers might look to Jake Harry to replace him. One are of no concern is the kicking game with Jef Wolfert. Wolfert hit 18 of 20 field goals last year, and was 4 out of 5 from 40 plus yards out.

The Tigers non conference slate is probably a little more difficult than would appear at first glance. Their tilt with Illinois could be an exciting game to watch, and playing Ole Miss in Oxford will be no guaranteed win, though talent wise, they have no excuse to lose. Western Michigan is no slouch either. While the Tigers are good enough to come out of the non conference portion of the season unscathed, they could also come out of it with at least one loss. Oddly enough, they play two games at neutral sites, where Pinkel is 4-2, including two wins over the Illini in St. Louis. Their home game with Nebraska on October 6th will determine the fate of this Tigers team. A win over the Huskers would give them the edge in the North, and the confidence to face the rest of their schedule. A loss, and the heat will be on Pinkel and the distraction, as well as the feeling early on that this is a lost season (as anything short of the division crown will be deemed a failure) may cause this team to wilt.


4. Colorado

The Buffaloes weren't as bad last year as their record would indicate. Defensively they were actually pretty good, and this year, with 9 starters back on offense, they won't rely as much on the defense. Last year's team lost 4 games by 5 points or less due largely to one of the worst passing attacks in school history. The offense can't help but improve, and with Cody Hawkins at quarterback, it should. He obviously knows his father's system and will benefit from having 3 returning starters on the offensive line, plus Ryan Miller, considered the top offensive line prospect in America. This Colorado line isn't overly talented, but it's experienced and solid. The real talent with this line lies on the 2nd and 3rd strings with some of the newcomers, who fortunately, injuries aside, won't be pressed into playing too early. One are the line can improve in though is pass protection. While they were solid run blockers, they allowed 31 sacks, though quarterbacks who were indecisive and receivers who couldn't get open helped inflate those numbers. Bernard Jackson will see some time at quarterback as they try to get his playmaking abilities on the field, but he's better suited to not have to run the offense. Should something happen to Hawkins, JUCO transfer Nick Nelson will be the quarterback.

The Buffs, despite no threat of a passing game, still averaged over 170 yards a game on the ground last year and Hugh Charles is back after averaging 5.6 ypc. Behind him is highly touted JUCO Patrick Gates who scored 23 touchdowns last year. The passing game was anemic a year ago, but they return everyone who caught a pass last year, so again, it has to improve. The most obvious sign the passing game was a sore spot is the fact that Riar Greer, a tight end, was the number one receiver. Furthermore, he led the team with just 24 catches and 3 touchdowns. In fact, no other Buffalo player had more than one scoring catch. Of the wide receivers, Alvin Barnett led them with 21 catches, but no receiver, no Buffalo player period for that matter, topped the 250 yard mark. So an infusion of talent is necessary, and freshmen Markques Sims is likely to be given every chance to play right away. The Buffaloes could also use a return to form by Dusty Sprague. He went from 44 catches in 2005 to just 11 last season. Sprague, more than anyone else, will probably benefit most from having a quarterback adept at going to his 2nd and 3rd options on passing plays, and not one who looks at option one and then decides it's time to run. Bernard Jackson will also get some playing time at receiver, and will give Mark Helfrich an added dimension to the offense. Jackson is the x factor here, as making quality use of him in his "slash" role could be a big factor in whether or not this offense can improve over it's lackluster performance in 2006.

On defense they do lose 5 starters, but other than Abraham Wright (11.5 sacks) and Thaddeus Washington (107 tkls), they don't really lose anyone of consequence. Jordan Dizon is back to anchor the defense at middle linebacker and should compete for national honors. Flanking him will be Brad Jones who had 72 tackles last year and either Michael Sipilli or R.J. Brown. Jones is a steady player, but doesn't make any big plays. In fact, he and Siplli, while combining to make over 100 tackles, made exactly zero behind the line of scrimmage, an alarming number. The Buffs are definitely searching for guys to team with Dizon that can make plays, but the pickings are pretty thin right now.

In front of Dizon the news is a little better as 2 starters return. However, Drew Hudgins had 19 sacks and 93 tackles at JUCO last year, Maurice Lucas has played well in a reserve role the past two years, and Alonzo Barrett started as a freshman before being injured back in 2005. So while both defensive ends will be a new starter, there shouldn't be a significant drop-off, even though they do have to replace Wright and his double digit sacks. Unfortunately for the Buffs, Hudgins won't be available to them this year. Even so, Barrett and Lucas should make a formidable duo. The loss of Hudgins opens the door for some of the other newcomers to step in and play right away. In the middle are two guys who will help keep the blockers off Dizon and the ends. Neither Georgie Hypolite or Brandon Nicolas are what you'd call big, both are just big enough, but offer enough quickness to be effective inside. Hypolite had 50 tackles last year, a high number for an interior lineman, and 10 of those were behind the line of scrimmage. Nicolas, a Notre Dame transfer, had 57. Their combined 107 tackles as sophomores has fans and coaches alike very excited about these two anchoring their defensive line for the next two seasons. So while the linebacker corps lacks playmakers to complement Dizon, there is no shortage of them up front.

Behind Dizon is a secondary that had it's problems a year ago, letting 2/3 of the passes thrown it's way be completed. The good news is All Big 12 performer Terrence Wheately is back at one corner. Lionel Harris only started 6 games a year ago at safety but still racked up 60 plus tackles, and Daniel Dykes started as a true freshman at Idaho and then had 4 interceptions in 2005 for the Vandals. Whether or not he supplants Harris, or perhaps Ryan Walters who started at the other safety spot last year remains to be seen, but his addition offsets the loss of J.J. Billingsley and should help improve the secondary. They could still use someone to step up opposite Wheatley, and depth is a concern at corner as 4 of the top 5 reserves have never taken a snap in a college game. Juniors Benjamin Burney and Gardner McKay appear to be battling it out for that other corner spot, but neither option is all that appealing as in their combined 4 years of play, they've only combined for 40 tackles and 1 pass defended. The newcomers will get a crack at cracking the lineup.

Last year's special teams did nothing to help their offense out, and it could be more of the same this season. The one strong suit to this squad last year was Mason Crosby. He was 19-28 on field goals, but 7 of his 9 misses came from 50 plus. A sign of how bad the offense was is the fact that he had as many field goal attempts from 40 plus as he did from less than 40. Now he must be replaced and first in line is senior Kevin Eberhart. Eberhart is strong legged, but it remains to be seen how he accurate he is as he's missed the only two field goals he's attempted here. The return game did very little to aide in the field position war, and while Stephone Robinson returns, his performance didn't instill enough confidence in the coaching staff to automatically keep him his job returning kicks. However, there may not be a better alternative as the Buffaloes have a dearth of game changing athletic playmakers, a sign of the talent demise in Boulder. One positive with the special teams is Matthew DiLallo, and he's back for his sophomore year.

The defense should be at least as good as it was a year ago, and the offense should be better. A brutal non conference schedule would seem to make getting back to the postseason extremely difficult. However, that could be offset by the fact that their conference road games are actually quite winnable, it wouldn't be unreasonable to expect them to win 3 out of 4. With Kansas and Miami University coming to Boulder, it leaves the season opening Colorado State game as perhaps the big swing game for the Buffs season. In a rivalry that Colorado owns, beating the Rams is a must for the season. If they do that, Colorado should get back to the postseason. Add to it, Missouri hasn't won in Boulder since 1997 and by the time they visit this year may be playing for a coach on his way out Colorado could more than triple their win total from a year ago.


5. Kansas

The Jayhawks scored 29 points a game last year, but that was with Jon Cornish running for 1,457 yards, a Kansas single season record. Problem A is the loss of three starters on the offensive line. The good news is that they will at least be replacing them with upper classmen. Both tackles return, with Anthony Collins capable of all league honors. Cesar Rodriguez started all 12 games last year and in 2005 and will be back to extend his streak of consecutive starts. The replacements will all come in the middle. Ryan Cantrell appears ready to step in at center, he's one of the strongest players on the team and has some experience, albeit at left guard, where he started 5 games as a redshirt freshmen in 2005. JUCO Chet Hartley will probably man one guard spot and Adrian Mayes the other. Mangino will probably go with these three as opposed to starting Marcus Anderson, a two year starter at the JUCO ranks who has seen next to no action at Kansas.

Problem B is that Cornish is gone and there really isn't anyone Mark Mangino can really count on to fill in and replace him. Jake Sharp, Angus Quigley and Cameron Boyd-Anderson appear to be the primary candidates to win the job, and each brings something different to the table. Sharp appears to be the most enticing possibility as he possesses the most speed and quickness, despite his size possibly the toughest runner the Jayhawks have on hand, and was the most highly sought after out of high school after scoring 63 touchdowns, a Kansas record. Keeping him in state was a big coup for Mangino, so you can imagine he'll try and reward him with the starting job. Sharp was impressive in very limited playing time a year ago, but he's still unproven at this level. Quigley is a little bigger and probably the more natural inside runner, but again, Sharp's toughness can't be underrated, though toughness can only do so much, size does matter. Anderson isn't quite as big as Quigley, but he's bigger than Sharp, though not quite as fast, though he's more nifty than Quigley. He's the tweener of the three backs, and being a true freshman might be redshirted this year if injuries don't force him to play. With Sharp just a sophomore, Mangino would prefer not to have to play Anderson, though he may not have a choice.  Three other true freshmen, Gary Green, Brian Murphy and Steven Foster may compete for playing time as well. Murphy's got the most promise as a return man, so he's the least likely to be redshirted. In any event, replacing Cornish is no small task, and it's some big shoes to fill by someone who's never been a primary ball carrier in college.

The number two rusher was quarterback Kerry Meier, who lost his job this fall to Todd Reesing. It wasn't that Meier was horrible last year, but he didn't do enough to show the coaches he could put the team on his shoulders and carry the offense. The coaching staff knows the potential exists for the passing game to be potent as Adam Barmann threw for over 400 against Nebraska. With the lack of a go to running back, and questions on the offensive line, the coaching staff felt they needed a quarterback who could do more than manage a game, they need one who shows a propensity to make a big play here and there, and Reesing fits the bill better than Meier. I wouldn't be surprised, if Reesing plays well, to see Meier transfer.

Reesing, who has good mobility, will have some targets to throw the ball to. Derek Fine is a solid senior tight end, who if not for the gluttony of tight ends in the Big 12, would be a more recognized name. The big key on offense though will be Marcus Herford. Herford was exciting and dangerous returning kicks last year, and at 6'3 210 he's a big guy who they need to become a big time receiver. Dexton Fields is a typical possession guy, 45 catches last year, but just 10 ypc. Though some of that could be attributed to Meier's inability to go downfield. Fields will benefit a great deal if Herford can be come the deep threat. Marcus Henry is another who should benefit from having Reesing throwing the ball. At 6'4 he has a height advantage over the corners in this league, and it's not like teams can just put their biggest corner on him, as the Jayhawks top three receivers are 6'0 or taller, and three of their top four come in at 6'3 or taller. Henry has the potential, like Herford, to potentially be an honorable mention Big 12 guy, and he's going to need to play like it for this offense to really succeed.

Defensively the guys in blue, sometimes red, (who I swear they seem determined to make their uniforms as New York Giantesque as possible) have undergone a remarkable turnaround under Mangino. It's this defensive renaissance that Mangino supporters will point to as to why his job should be safe. When Mangino arrived in 2002, this defense allowed 42.3 points per gam and 256 a game on the ground. Last season, despite just returning 3 starters, they allowed 25.5 pp, and a mere 109 a game on the ground. Unfortunately they were shredded through the air, 5 teams went over the 350 mark against this defense. A lot of that though was due to the run defense's success as teams threw it nearly 40 times a game against the Jayhawks. Aqib Talib is one of the best cornerbacks in all of college football, and Anthony Webb learned through trial by fire as a true freshmen last year, picking of 6 passes. His continued improvement could help make this one of the country's more improved secondaries. Depth behind them might be a problem though as of their next 4 corners, 3 of them are guys who weren't with the program a year ago. Additionally, projected starter at safety Patrick Resby is another newcomer who will team with Darrel Stuckey, who like Webb, had to play as a true freshmen. With so many new faces, the secondary is still a question, but the fact that Stuckey and Webb learned on the job last year could pay dividends and this unit should improve.

The front seven brings back 5 starters and should closely resemble the run defense of 2005 that allowed only 83 ypg and 2.4 ypc. Mike Rivera and Joe Mortensen make up a very reliable pair of linebackers who simply make tackles. James Holt missed time with injuries last year, but he provides the potential for an athletic and dynamic playmaker. Sophomores Artis Wright and Jake Schemer both showed some potential in limited time last year, and both posses more athletic ability than Rivera and Mortensen. While neither will likely press for a starting role this year, they do provide some decent depth, and will likely force their way onto the field more as the season wears on.

The defensive line may only return two starters, but one of them is James McClinton who was 2nd team Big 12 last year, which considering the defensive line prowess of Oklahoma and Texas, is quite an accomplishment. Kansas is still looking for answers though when it comes to who will line up on both sides of McClinton. At the other tackle spot the Jayhawks are in real trouble. Todd Haselhorst had a decent year as a freshman but missed 2005 with an injury and wasn't very impressive at all last season when he got on the field. Unfortunately, there aren't a whole lot of options beyond him. If something happens to McClinton this year, Kansas' defensive line is in serious trouble. On McClinton's other side the team has to replace defensive end Paul Como who had 4.5 sacks a year ago. Sophomore Jeff Wheeler is the guy slated to do that, and he could be primed for a big year. He was the scout team MVP in 2005 and in limited action had two sacks last year. Wheeler is just one of several options at defensive end that the team needs to become a big time pass rusher. Jason Larson also had two sacks last year and redshirt freshmen Maxwell Onyegbule was the scout team's co-defensive player of the year. Onyegbule is perhaps the most athletic of the players vying for that other end spot, but he's also the rawest. Russell Brorsen appears to have the other end position nailed down as the former tight end had 8 starts and 4 sacks a year ago. The ends have potential, and there are some good options for a solid rotation, but man, after McClinton, the tackle position is a scary position, and not for opponents, but for the Jayhawks.

The special teams units for Kansas aren't anything special, but they also aren't going to cost the Jayhawks any games either. Herford is back as a kick returner and may had put returner to that list as well, as the Jayhawks lose a pair who both averaged double digits in returns a year ago. Sharp is a possibility, and so is Brian Murphy as well as Donte Bean. Expect Mangino to take the role of finding a punt returner very seriously as he knows his offense may struggle with the heavy losses on the interior line and at running back, so regardless of who it is or if they start, the player who is the biggest threat to score will get the job returning punts. Punter Kyle Tucker had an extremely disappointing year after being a Ray Guy semifinalist in 2005. The Jayhawks could use a bounce back year from him. Scott Webb missed three extra points, and missed a field goal from less than 30 yards. He also was 8-8 from 30-39, and 4-8 from 40 and beyond. The Jayhawks know they could do a lot worse. Strong legged freshman Stephen Hodge though may get a crack at the job, or in the least be used on kickoffs. 85% of his kickoffs in high school were touchbacks, so with the new kickoff rules, strong legged kickoff specialists are a hot commodity this year. The coverage units should again be pretty solid as the team has some young, athletic players as reserves who will see time on special teams.

There seems to be a 50/50 split on those who support Mangino and those that don't. Those that don't point to the fact that Colorado, Kansas State and Nebraska were down recently and the Jayhawks couldn't capitalize, still going just 11-21 in conference the past four years. They've also yet to win more than 1 road game per season under Mangino. His supporters will say that the Jayhawks aren't the laughing stock they were at the beginning of the century. Last year they averaged 44,000 fans, not bad for a basketball school, especially considering ULM and Northwestern State were two of the home games they Jayhawks played. The non conference schedule for the Jayhawks is extremely favorable. All four games are in Lawrence. Toledo and Central Michigan do pose legit threats, but if Mangino is really the right man for this job, Kansas should take care of MAC teams at home and should start the year 4-0. With Baylor and Iowa State coming to Lawrence, 6 wins and a bowl should be the case. However, the Jayhawks road woes probably won't be coming to an end, and they are opting to play Missouri at a neutral site. Kansas is 11-2 at home the last two years, and will probably have to go 6-1 to return to a bowl this year. However, for Mangino to keep his job it may take a couple road wins over Kansas State and Colorado to push this team to the 8 win mark, and a higher finish in the division. Jayhawk fans don't want another Forth Worth Bowl bid, their goals are loftier, and if they can find a way to beat Colorado and/or Kansas State on the road and win 7 games, they may be an attractive team to the Sun Bowl or Alamo Bowl, because this team should be playing it's best football at the end of the season.


6. Iowa State

Kansas fans might want to pay close attention to what goes on in Ames this year as the Cyclones are an example of a program who was once in shambles, was turned around to respectability by a coach who just couldn't get them over the hump and was subsequently fired. A similar situation took place in Syracuse and the Orange faithful are probably longing for the days of Pasquolini and his consistent bowl trips. Will Iowa State fans be clamoring for the same thing? If they struggle this year, will that be something that might keep Mangino at Kansas?

Last year the Cyclones lost 8 games, just the second losing season in 7 years with McCarney, and the problem was offense. It was the second time in the McCarney tenure that the team returned 8 or more starters. Amazingly, those were the two worst offensive years in McCarney's reign. An offensive line that couldn't hold back a middle school team was largely responsible for the offenses inability to produce. Just three times they went over 21 points last year, and 8 times they failed to go over 105 yards on the ground. They also allowed 38 sacks, which considering the mobility of Bret Meyer is really inexcusable. So perhaps having only one starter back is a good thing. With a new coaching staff, it's probably best. The Cyclones are expected to only have 2 seniors in their two deep on the line, and just one senior starter. What that may lead to though is a repeat of last year's disaster. The running game was bad last year, but there is hope this year. Stevie Hicks is gone, but he's been gone his entire career it seems constantly battling injury. JUCO transfer J.J. Bass offers decent size and decent speed and could become the starter. Jason Scales is a big back, and Jason Harris is a former defensive back. It looks like a running back by committee unit, but if anyone can seize the spot for themselves it's Bass who hasn't had time yet to disappoint. Of course, it won't matter much who is running with this porous offensive line.

If the line can find a way to give Bret Meyer some time, the passing game has the potential to be decent. Meyer was outstanding over the final stretch of 2005, but spent a lot of time running for his life last year. Despite that, he didn't miss a snap and still nearly totaled 3,000 yards of offense. His touchdowns and interceptions though equaled each other, something that has to be corrected, and having more time to throw would help. He loses Austin Flynn and Jon Davis, but Toddy Blythe is back and healthy this year and R.J. Sumrall is a good athlete who is the perfect complement to Blythe. The offense has a quarterback who, if on a decent team, would be an honors candidate and is the case of a right guy wrong situation, a bevy of solid if not spectacular tailbacks, and an All American caliber receiver. The problem though is the offensive line is so bad it may not matter. This offense might approach the low of 2003 when they only averaged 14 a game, and lost 10 games.

The defense last year, after two years of impressive progress, took major steps back. The pass defense was far too lenient with opposing quarterbacks as opposing quarterbacks completed nearly 3/4 of their passes as teams racked up 31 ppg. Seven starters do come back on defense, so there is optimism on this side of the ball. One of those seven back is Alvin Brown, a guy who had 155 tackles a year ago and is one of the best linebackers in college football. Jon Banks is a steady performer who is on the other side, but the Cyclones do have to replace their middle linebacker, and the options there aren't very pretty. JUCO Michael Bibbs seemed to have the edge coming out of spring practice, though talented redshirt freshmen Kris Means will likely find his way onto the field in some capacity. An intriguing option would have been Adam Carper. Carper is a former defensive back and he can run. He had 39 tackles in 5 starts last year before being injured. Unfortunately he won't be back this season. This is a team who can ill afford any injuries, but especially at linebacker now as depth is a primary concern, and the loss of Carper further depletes a linebacker corps that has next to no depth.

Up front two starters are back, but his is a unit that allowed 154 ypg on the ground. Newcomer Michael Tate, who originally signed with Arkansas, could be the key to the run defense. He'll team beside 320 lb Athyba Rubin. Part of Iowa State's woes in pass defense could be attributed to their pass rush, or extreme lack thereof. Their 24 sacks were a meager amount, though they feel Rashawn Parker, a former running back with good speed and athletic ability who had 3 sacks as a freshman, could become a force at one end. As for the other, they don't really have an answer. Kurtis Taylor and Travis Ferguson both seem to be set to vie for the other end spot, but both missed last season with injuries. This is a line short on experience and short on talent.

The secondary will be better, 3 of their 4 starters are back, and Allen Bell is a JUCO transfer who can flat fly, and has decent size. Chris Singleton was the teams 5th leading tackler from his corner position, and his 3 pass defended tied for 2nd on the team, while his two interceptions, sadly, led the Cyclones. Sophomore Steve Johnson will likely man one safety spot after starting 2 games at corner and 2 at safety a year ago. However, with Devin McDowell, their projected nickel corner suspended this spring and no word yet on whether or not he will be back, Johnson might be used in that role, opening the door for James, and undersized sophomore or possibly Brandon Hunley. Caleb Berg is the starter at the other safety spot, and there aren't any questions there. Berg had 76 tackles and 3 passes defended. He's not a household name, and won't be after this year, but he's a steady player with good size who will probably make a good special teams player in the NFL. The secondary has to be better, it can't be worse, it's doubtful it's going to improve that much over last year. You can't get blood out of a turnip, and there are a few turnips in this backfield.

Iowa State should be solid again on special teams as Mike Brandtner returns as a punter after averaging 41.2 ypp last year and Bret Culbertson is a steady kicker who went 8 of 11 a year ago. Milan Moses is a solid kick returner, though someone must replace Ryan Baum, one of the country's finer punt returners last year. Allen Bell may get the chance to return punts for the Cyclones.

Iowa State enters this year as perhaps one of the worst teams in all the BCS conferences. They open with three home games and their first two (Kent State and Northern Iowa) could be their two best shots at victory all year. 9 or 10 losses is to be expected from this team.

Big 12 South Preview: Sooners, Longhorns Vie for a Title

Aug 25, 2007

Icon1. Oklahoma

A lot of people made a lot to do about Oklahoma not being that great a team last year, and argued that Boise State's bowl win wasn't anything special, because it was a weak Oklahoma team that was lucky to win the conference.

However, a reverse argument could be made. This Sooner team was a bad officiating call from going 12-1 last year and possibly having a crack at the national title, and that was with Paul Thompson at quarterback.

If anything, Sam Bradford will hold par to what Thompson did. Offensively the Sooners ran the ball effectively, in fact, at 4.5 ypc they had their 2nd most efficient year on the ground the past 6 years. The passing game didn't produce a ton of yards, but was still effective. 8 starters are back this year, though Allen Patrick could be considered a starter since he did start 5 games in place of an injured Adrian Peterson last year, and Bradford is likely an upgrade over Thompson. The pieces are in place for this Sooner offense to be as good as the 2004 unit. One advantage Bradford and the Sooner offense has over Thompson and the 2006 squad is that this year their starting quarterback won't be practicing at receiver up until August when he gets switched back to quarterback. Furthermore, the depth is better this season. If Bradford struggles, the coaches will likely not hesitate to go with Keith Nichol, the true freshman who was there for spring practice. While they'd like to redshirt him, seeing that Bradford is a freshman, if Joey Halzle couldn't beat out Paul Thompson, is he the guy they really want to turn to?

Aiding Bradford will be Patrick and very highly touted DeMarco Murray in the backfield. This one-two punch might be more effective than Adrian Peterson was by himself. The leading receivers are all back, including Malcolm Kelly who had a breakout 2006. WIth 62 grabs and nearly 1,000 yards, as well as ten scores. By the time this season ends he will likely be the 2 all time receiver in Sooner history as he should top last year's numbers now that Bradford, a more accomplished passer than Thompson, is the quarterback. The offensive line brings back 4 starters, plus 350 lb JUCO Phil Loadholt to take over at left tackle. There is also depth along the offensive front which will likely be quite useful as there are bound to be some injuries in the rough and tumble Big 12 south which features some of the finer defensive lines in the nation.

On defense Oklahoma, got back to Sooner football after a down year in 2005. The pass defense got back to under 200 ypg and the run defense held opponents under 100 for the 3rd straight season. 7 starters return on that side of the ball, but the talent and depth here is almost unreal. Up front the tackles are the strength. Steven Coleman, Gerald McCoy and DeMarcus Granger give them some guys in the 290-300 range that are good athletes and top flight players. They have to replace both ends, but its not like the Sooner were feasting on quarterbacks last year. They just need the replacements to be solid. It would be nice if Alonzo Dotson finally lived up to his billing as a freshmen as he finally gets the chance to start.

The linebackers, though, are scary good. Their second string unit is full of guys who could be all Big 12 if they were starting. JUCO Mike Reed may be the starter in the middle. At 6'1 250 he provides plenty of size, and his quick enough to be a playmaker. On the outside some combination of Lewis Baker, Ryan Reynolds, Curtis Lofton and Demarrio Pleasant will team up to surround Reed. All four are all star caliber players, and all four will see playing time. THeir stats may not be impressive as the playing time will probably get spread out pretty evenly, but the depth will allow an impressive rotation and plenty of situational substitution to optimize matchups. They also need to find a place for freshmen Austin Box, he just might be too good to redshirt. Don't be surprised if the Sooner use Lofton and Pleasant as rush ends in passing situations, thus enabling them to get Baker and Reynolds on the field with them.

There's also a gluttony of riches in the secondary. Reggie Smith goes from safety to corner, and D.J. Wolfe goes to safety. Smith, in addition to being a dangerous return man, is a playmaker on defense. Either Marcus Walker or Lendy Holmes will be starting opposite him, and the Sooner can't really go wrong with either one. Holmes showed a knack for making big plays in run support with 5 tackles behind the line of scrimmage while Marquis Walker intercepted 3 passes and broke up an impressive 9 others. These two might rotate in and out based on situations in almost what you could call a platoon as they compliment each other well. While Wolfe is likely to nail down one starting spot, the other safety will be Nic Harries or Darien Williams. Like at corner, they can't go wrong either way, both of whom have All American potential. Williams, a senior, has started 15 games the past two years and recorded 110 tackles in that span, while Harris, just a junior boasts impressive size at 6'3 226, so much so he spent some time practicing at linebacker, where he might see some playing time if Ryan Reynolds can't go this year. Harris made 10 starts a year ago and 68 tackles, as well as 4 interceptions and 8 passes defended. Williams experience might give him an edge when it comes to starting, but whoever doesn't start will get plenty of playing time. Harris could be used at both safety spots, as a potential 4th cornerback, and at linebacker. His versatility gives coordinators Brent Venables and Bobby Jack Wright even more toys to play with on defense.

The Sooners have all the pieces in place for a championship run, including good special teams. Their incredible depth at linebacker should really show up with their kick coverage units, and their return game will be one of the most explosive in college football. Reggie Smith is a fantastic return man, and Juaquin Inglesias returned a kickoff for a score last year while averaging close to 26 ypr. Michael Cohen isn't spectacular, but he's a steady punter, and Garrett Hartley was a Groza finalist last year.

Oklahoma's offense won't be mistaken for a juggernaut, but it should be able to top 30 points a game without much problem, while the defense should be dominant. The defense is loaded, and regardless of what happens with the offense, is good enough to carry this team to the national title game. The Texas game will be huge, but with A&M and Oklahoma State coming to Norman, the Texas game will likely settle the South. If LSU slips up somewhere, OU, with a favorable schedule, could run the table and be playing for the BCS championship.



2. Texas

The Longhorns' place here is tentative. They have the ability to supplant Oklahoma, but they also have the ability to finish as low as 4th in this division, as shocking as that may seem.

Last year's Longhorn team struggled down the stretch, losing its final two regular season games and then squeaking past Iowa. Their late season troubles could be attributed directly to the disappearance of the running game. Over the final three games the Horns only totaled 283 yards rushing 91 attempts, basically averaging 3 ypc. A defense that forced turnovers and wreaked havoc on quarterbacks helped make the Texas offense appear better than it actually was. Great field position often made scoring points a much easier task as it didn't take a whole lot of yards for the Horns to get in scoring position, which was a good thing. During those final three games though the Horns were -2 in turnovers, and the results showed up with them losing 2 of those games. That could be a sign of things to come in 2007. If Texas isn't forcing a lot of turnovers, will the offense be good enough to score the points to keep this team in national title contention?

As mentioned, the rushing attack struggled at the end of the year. For a team who averaged roughly 275 yards a game rushing the past three years, to average less than 100 over a three game stretch is a cause for concern. Texas is hoping Jamaal Charles shows the explosiveness he demonstrated as a freshman. It's not as though Charles was bad last year, he averaged 5.3 ypc, but is he the kind of back you can just turn and feed the ball to consistently? There is some talent behind him, it's just not experienced talent. Mack Brown is hoping he won't have to rely much on it and Charles can be the guy.

Unfortunately for Charles, this offensive line will be really young, especially on the left side. Cedrick Dockery and Tony Hills both return as starters and center Dallas Griffin has seen lots of playing time during his career and will finally be the starter at center. However, it is that left side that's a concern. Two sophomores are expected to start, and Texas faces some talented defensive ends and outside linebackers (TCU, Kansas State, Oklahoma, Nebraska, Oklahoma State) that could take major advantage. How quickly Charlie Tanner and Adam Ulatoski adapt to Big 12 play will be a major key to getting the ground game, though Ulatoski did start 7 games last year helping to prep him for this season.

The passing game, initially expected to be the strength of this offense (and one of the best in the nation) now might be a concern. Injuries continue to hamper the receiving corps as now Billy Pittman and Limas Sweed are dealing with injuries, with Pittman's appearing to be more serious. When healthy, this receiving corps ranks among the best in America as the top four pass catchers from 2006 are all back, as well as their tight end. Colt McCoy more than surpassed expectations a year ago, but that was also with a veteran offensive line that only allowed 19 sacks. With those youngsters on his blind side, McCoy may not be afforded the kind of time he had last year. Also of concern will be McCoy's ability to stay healthy, as the depth behind him is completely void of any experience. Sherrod Harris was expected to be the number two guy, but he's hurt, leaving John Chiles, who was a candidate to be moved to receiver, as the team's number two option. Both Harris and Chiles are extraordinarily talented, but neither have thrown a pass in college. Then again, McCoy hadn't either prior to last year.

The health of McCoy's receivers will be paramount to the success of this offense. With the expected growing pains of the offensive line, the Horns need to have their receivers and quarterback on the same page from the get-go, as you can expect plenty of hot routes and on the fly changes as teams will be sending a lot of pressure after McCoy. One name you might want to get familiar with is Jermichael Finley. He's a tight end who promises to play a prominent role in the offense. After catching 31 passes last year, don't be surprised if he gets up near 45 or so this season, either out of necessity due to the injuries to the stars on the outside, or because those on the outside command so much attention. The offense has the talent at the skill positions to be as good as any in college football, but with youngsters on the left side of the line, there is a little reason to be hesitant to buy so quickly into this offense being able to match it's point production from a year ago. I would say that if the Horns don't continue to force turnovers and win the field position battle with defense that this offense will probably have it's lowest point production in the past 6 years. However, the Horns haven't lost the turnover battle over the course of a season during that span.

On defense, Texas was outstanding against the run, but struggled against the pass. In fact, in conference games they allowed nearly 270 yards a game through the air, including 519 to Texas Tech, and 300 plus to Nebraska, Baylor, Iowa State and Kansas State. The disturbing part of those numbers is the fact that the only other teams Baylor hit 300 against were Kansas and Northwestern State; Kansas State didn't hit the 300 mark against anyone else; Nebraska's only other 300 yard games came against Louisiana Tech and Kansas; and Iowa State's only other 300 yard effort came against Northern Iowa. When your pass defense can be compared to Kansas', that's a bad sign, especially when you had future high NFL draft choices in the secondary. So is it a good or bad thing that there will likely be 3 new starters in the secondary? By the end of the year it could be a very good thing, but at the outset? Not so much. Of their top three options at cornerback, redshirt freshman Chykie Brown, true freshman Curtis Brown, and sophomore Deon Beasley, there is a total of 1 college start between them. Chris Brown was in for the spring, which should speed along his development, and might enable him to win a starting job. There is no denying the immense talent of the three, but there is also denying how incredibly raw they are. Texas is in better shape at safety as Drew Kelson finally gets his turn to start after patiently waiting his turn behind future NFL players, although another senior, Erick Jackson will push him. Kelson has good speed to go with good size and is a potential NFL prospect and might see some time at corner, especially early in the season. The other safety is Marcus Griffin who had 90 tackles last year. This unit, by the end of the year, will probably be a top notch secondary, however, during the first month or so it's going to struggle as everyone gets acclimated with both each other, and at corner, playing D-1 football. Fortunately for Texas, their first three games aren't against teams who like to throw the ball, but beginning September 29th with Rice, there is a three game stretch with Rice, Kansas State and Oklahoma where this secondary gets tested.

While the question marks abound in the secondary, none exist in front of them. The defensive line features NFL players all throughout the two deep. They must replace both defensive ends, but there are plenty of talented options. Juniors Brian Orakpo and Aaron Lewis have both been productive in limited playing time, combining last year for 7.5 sacks and 6.5 tackles for a loss. Sophomore Lamarr Houston though could be the stud of the bunch. At 6'2 265 with the speed of a linebacker, Houston has the potential to be a top ten draft pick one day. In the middle the Horns have plenty of beef there too. Frank Okam didn't have quite the year last year that he had in 2005, but he and Roy Miller were still very effective, as evident by the fact this defense allowed a mere 61 yards a game on the ground and just 2.3 ypc. Depth is provided by Derek Lokey who missed time with an injury last year though he began the year as a starter.

Finding a way to get all their linebackers on the field will be a daunting task for defensive coordinators Larry MacDuff and Duane Akina. In fact, considering the issues at corner, don't be surprised to see Kelson play some corner and this team use a 4-4 defense at times, or more of a 46 look with 4 linebackers on the field, as they have linebackers as athletic as safeties. The middle is manned by Rashad Bobino who had double digit tackles behind the line. His playmaking skills will be flanked by two seniors in Robert Killebrew and Scott Derry. Some of the woes of Texas' pass defense last year could be attributed to the linebackers poor coverage skills, which is why the more athletic Roddrick Muckelroy and Sergio Kindle may get more playing time on the outside. Killebrew and Derry combined to only defend two passes all of last year, a number that must increase for the Texas pass defense to improve, so while young and inexperienced, the Horns staff may just rely on the athletic talents alone of Kindle and Muckelroy and let them learn some more on the job. If the pass defense does improve, this defense will be good enough for this team to contend for the national championship, because the run defense will more than suffice. Last year's rush defense only allowed two teams to go over 100 yards, and held seven teams to 40 yards or less, and more of the same can be expected this year.

Quan Cosby will likely assume all the returning jobs, though with injuries so rampant among the receiver position, Mack Brown might hold off on using him as a return man until the unit gets healthier. Cosby will be one of the nation's best return men though, and Texas has plenty of high caliber athletes to put back there in the event Brown doesn't use him there early in the year. Trevor Gerland will become the new punter, though he did get a little playing time last year and his numbers were very similar to former starter Greg Johnson. Johnson also kicked field goals last year, though Ryan Bailey eventually replaced him and was 6 of 6 on field goals.

Texas' secondary and left side of the offensive line are the team's biggest questions. The secondary won't be tested in the first month of the season, but the offensive line will in their 2nd game of the year when Texas plays host to TCU. TCU will be laying it all on the line in this one, as they hope to start their quest for the Fiesta Bowl and their defense will test the Texas running game and offensive line. If Sweed and Pittman can't go, or aren't 100 percent, the Longhorns title hopes might be derailed early on. They get Kansas State preceding Oklahoma, which ordinarily might be a trap game, but the Horns have revenge on their mind, they won't lose to KSU in Austin. Texas only has 3 home losses the past 7 years, and two of them came last year (Ohio State, Texas A&M), so you can pretty much mark the Horns for at least 5 wins in their home games, though the Nebraska game is no gimme. Texas doesn't have any real tough road games until November, which is good considering some of the questions they want to answer first. By the time Nebraska comes calling at the end of October and the Horns hit the road to Stillwater and College Station in November, this team will probably be playing it's best football. At this point will they still be in position to win the national title? Quite possibly yes. I don't think they will have gelled enough in time to beat Oklahoma, but an 11-1 season is a very distinct possibility. Then again, if the secondary doesn't come around, this Texas time, à la last year's team, could flounder in November against the Pokes and the Aggies...and the Horns could find themselves 4th in the division.



3. Oklahoma State

So they allowed 25.6 points per game last year (only Iowa State and Baylor allowed more)?

So they allowed over 30 points per game in conference?

So if not for three games against Missouri State, Arkansas State, and Florida Atlantic the defensive stats would have been much worse?

So what.

The Oklahoma State offense brings back 8 starters to a unit that put up over 35 points per game, averaging over 200 on the ground and through the air. The result is a team that will play in plenty of exciting games, a team who won't be out of any game they play, and team who with just marginal improvement on defense might surprise a ton of people and wind up playing football on New Year's Day.

The defense brings back 7 starters. Unfortunately, none of them play on the defensive line, though ten of the team's top eleven tacklers do return. The run defense was the best run defense in Stillwater since 2002, but there are no "starters" back. The defense also had 37 sacks last year (though 12 came against those three weaklings on their non conference schedule), but unfortunately for Mike Gundy, Victor DeGrate, and Ryan McBean, who combined for 14 of those sacks, are gone.

The good news is that one could argue that Marque Fountain and Nathan Peterson are returning starters. Fountain started 9 games in 2004 and had 7 tackles for a loss, then missed 2005 and started 4 games a year ago as injuries have plagued him. Injuries also have cost Nathan Peterson. Peterson, in his second year back from an ACL injury didn't start last year, but he did play a lot, especially in passing situations and registered 8 sacks. The key this year for him will be to be able to hold up against the run, as at 240 lbs, he's not the biggest defensive end in a conference full of 300 lb offensive tackles. Adding depth on the outside is stud freshmen Richettie Jones. With Peterson starting, Jones will likely assume Peterson's role as situational pass rusher, a role he could excel in. Inside though there are bigger question marks as there is virtually no experience.

The line's strength will be its pass rush, though with the questions inside, and the lack of size outside, the run stopping abilities of this line will be tested, which will put a big onus on the linebackers, who should be up to the challenge. This is a unit that is gifted athletically and boasts good size. Rodrick Johnson, at 6-3, 250 is a senior and the glue to this defense, but he could also be used some on the defensive line as they might play Fountain inside more often. Johnson doesn't excel in pass coverage, but his steady and good against the run. The outside linebackers though are both young, and both frighteningly gifted. Patrick Lavine started 9 games as a true freshman a year ago and finished 2nd on the team in tackles, including 7 behind the line of scrimmage. He also proved more than capable in pass coverage. On the other side, if he gets past the legal troubles, is Chris Collins, a redshirt sophomore who is among the more talented linebackers in the Big Twelve. At 240 and running with speed like a defensive back, Collins could be in store for a huge season. He was leading the team in tackles after 6 games last year before tearing his ACL. His ability to come back from that injury will play a major, major role in how much the Cowboys defense improves this season. Alex Odiari and Jeremy Nethon were the two who replaced him last year, and while both are steady, neither is close to the playmaker Collins is. His presence, and his being at his best, will be huge for this defense, as it will allow new defensive coordinator Tim Beckman to get very creative on defense. This front seven is full of athletic guys between 230 and 250 lbs who can be interchangeable at linebacker and defensive end, so Beckman will have plenty of players to get very creative with. Another intriguing possibility is that with Ricky Price's strong spring, Donovan Woods, the former quarterback turned safety who made 62 tackles last year at safety could be moved to outside linebacker if Collins can't go due to legal problems or his knee.

Price is a receiver turned defensive back who has caught 20 passes in his first two years. If Woods stays at safety, he will team with sophomore Andre Sexton to provide one of the faster safety tandems in the conference, if not one of the better duos. Sexton led the team in tackles last year and also tied for the team lead in tackles for a loss, as a true freshman. He's got superstar written all over him, and with experience you can only imagine he will improve in pass coverage. Martel Van Zant is an all league caliber cornerback. The number two corner isn't set in stone, and sophomore Perrish Cox will push junior Jacob Lacey for the job. Cox is a little bigger, and is probably a little more talented. Lacey started all 13 games last year and is a good tackler, but he doesn't have a lot of big play ability. If Cox limits his giving up the big play, he presents the better option. The pass defense wasn't bad last year, only three teams threw for over 300 yards, and those three were Texas, Texas Tech and Houston, teams that had pretty good passing attacks.

On the surface, it appears the offense has no questions, not with 8 starters returning from a team that put up the numbers it did last year. However, the passing game was inconsistent last year. If not for the 411 yards against Kanas this passing attack would have ranked even lower than the 8th place ranking it had in passing yards per game in conference play. Baylor, Texas A&M, Oklahoma and Colorado were worse. Quarterback Bobby Reid suffered through some injuries last year that probably helped contribute to the inconsistencies, not to mention he was still learning on the go. Now as a seasoned junior, much is expected of Reid. He better produce because they don't have a lot faith in Zac Robinson, though Alex Cate does offer some potential behind him.

Progress made by Reid though could be offset by some attrition at receiver. Artrell Woods was expected to start, but a freak weight room incident may have ended his college football career. Additionally senior Anthony Parks has opted to transfer, and with Ricky Price moving to safety, some depth concerns have reared their ugly head at the position. Adarius Bowman is one of the best receivers in all of college football, but he won't have D'Juan Woods to keep defenses honest this year, so he will be hard pressed to reach the 60 catches and 1,000 yards he had last year. True freshman Desmond Bryant was going to be expected to contribute off the bat as it was, now there is even more pressure on him to come in and produce. He's definitely talented enough, one of the most sought after receivers in America and he has good size. The Cowboys are one of the few teams in the nation that can boast of two 220 lb receivers that run like guys 195. Expect tight end Brandon Pettigrew's role to increase more as well. He caught 24 passes last year, but I imagine he'll have a few more chances this year. At 6'6' he's a big target. The size of the pass catchers alone should help Reid increase his 55.4 completion percentage from a year ago, but there is still the depth issue here.

Whatever depth issues are at receiver certainly don't exist in the backfield. Mike Hamilton, who nearly ran for 1,000 yards as a freshman in 2005, and then ran for 546 and averaged 5.6 ypc last year transferred to Georgia Southern, and the Cowboys won't skip a beat, that's how good this backfield is. Dantrell Savage can fly, but he's a tough runner too. He was hurt at the beginning of the year last season and was probably never 100 percent, and he still ran for 820 yards and 6.5 ypc. Behind him, Keith Toston is probably even faster, and Julius Crosslin is an experienced running back who provides a little power to the backfield. Bobby Reid also added over 600 yards rushing himself. The Cowboys ran for 2,704 yards last year and 23 touchdowns. The possibility exists that they could duplicate those numbers again this season.

Both tackles return on the offensive line, and for a team whose running game is based on speed, having those tackles to seal the perimeter is vital. Adding to the excitement is left tackle Russell Okung, who started 8 games as a true freshmen last year and put on and additional 20 lbs, which is important as this Cowboys offensive line isn't exactly big. They do have to replace both their guards, as Steve Denning and Andrew Lewis were both 2nd string last year but played very little. The teams in the south are loaded at defensive tackle, so the play of these two is going to be very, very critical this season.

The special teams in Stillwater are always good under Joe DeForest and this year's unit should rank among the best in the Big Twelve. Perrish Cox was dynamic as a return man a year ago and should once again excel in that role. Jason Ricks didn't miss a field goal under 40 yards all season last year, and was 3-5 on kicks of 40 and beyond, so the Cowboys do have a reliable kicker to turn to.

Oklahoma State fans are excited, and they should be. Unfortunately, the road schedule isn't kind to the Cowboys. They may very well knock off Texas in November, but it probably won't be enough to propel them higher up in the division. They have to play at Texas A&M and Oklahoma, and they draw Nebraska from the north and must play them in Lincoln. The Cowboys have gone just 3-8 under Gundy on the road, and are just 6-14 on the road in conference games the past 5 years. Oklahoma State, definitely on defense, was a much better team at home than on the road a year ago, and unless they can reverse that trend, those three road games are going to likely derail any hopes of winning the Big Twelve. Considering they've lost 10 of 11 to Kansas State as well, and they have to face Georgia on the road to open, this is a team with a drastic difference in best case/worst case scenarios. Worst case is they lose 6 games. Best case is that this is a team with enough talent to think about challenging for the division crown, and they either snap a three game losing streak to Texas A&M or they beat Texas for the first time since 1997. Although even if they head to Norman to close the year with a shot to beat Oklahoma and win the division, the fact that they've lost the last two games in Norman by a combined score of 94-23 will probably be on their minds. Ultimately, their game with the Aggies is the one they need to have circled as it will either leave them in a position to challenge for a top tier bowl, or leave them scrambling to make one at all


4. Texas A&M

So the seat is pretty warm for Dennis Franchione.

Franchione, à la Greg Robinson, has taken a program that seemed to level off and watched it decline a bit.

The Aggies might be another case of fans and boosters being a little too greedy and unrealistic with their expectations, as R.C. Slocum had this program in a good spot. Franchione's career record is 100-77, but he's only 2 games above .500 while at College Station and is 2 games under .500 in conference play. Not to mention, the last time this team won a bowl game was under Slocum back in 2001. Aggie fans are hoping last year's 9-4 record and victory over Texas are an indication that the program is getting back to where it was, and is capable of being, consistently in the 8-,9-, and 10-win range. If this year proves last year was an aberration, Franchione may not see 2008. The fact that Kyle Field didn't sell out last year, and in fact averaged about 7,000 fans short shows just how much faith Aggie Nation has in Franchione. Also of note is the fact while Kyle Field has a reputation for being one of the nation's toughest stadiums to play in, the Aggies are just 17-9 at home the last 4 years with 5 of those losses by double digits.

Offensively, one could look at the Aggies numbers and say they got worse from 2005, and the truth is, they did. However an improved defense prevented that from being a hindrance. The Aggies bring back 9 starters to a unit that still was pretty good last year, averaging over 200 yards a game on the ground and close to it through the air. Improvement is expected this fall as Stephen McGee returns at quarterback after having a breakthrough year last year. Look for the Aggies to open up the offense more as McGee proved more than capable last season throwing 12 touchdowns to just 2 interceptions. The low touchdown and yardage totals have more to do with the Aggies playcalling than McGee's abilities as he also completed over 60 percent of his passes. Make no mistake about it, McGee's strength is his ability to tuck the ball and run, but he's no slouch of a passer either. Redshirt freshmen Jarrod Johnson, a receiver out of high school is big, strong, and also mobile and will likely garner some playing time, but this is McGee's team, no question about it.

What McGee really needs is for someone to step up at wide receiver. Tight end Martellus Bennett is a good one, but he's their leading returning receiver, 2 on the team last year. It's usually not a good sign when a tight end is your 2 receiver. Kerry Franks has blazing speed, but his route running and hands have prevented him from being a go-to guy at the position. Earvin Taylor possesses excellent size, but he has to average more than the 8.9 ypc he had in 2006. Again though, a lot of that has to do with the playcalling by the Aggies. Aggie fans are still waiting on Howard Morrow, a top 20 prospect out of high school, to show up. Just 4 starts, and only 13 catches in two years. With nobody else stepping forward at receiver, the opportunity is there for him to seize it and make use of the potential he has. Morrow has the most potential of all the Aggie pass catchers, and the team really needs him to make use of it it, and to do it now. One name to keep in mind is E.J. Shankle, a sophomore who possesses the most potential to be the big play threat at the position.

If the Aggies are going to take the next step they absolutely must find someone on the outside who can make plays consistently. Otherwise, teams will load up to stop the run. If they can find one, just one guy, who can become a consistent threat to keep defenses honest, this offense, with the offensive line and backfield as talented as it is, and with Bennett at tight end, will be one of the nation's best, and will be good enough for the Aggies to seriously entertain thoughts of playing in a top tier bowl. However, there just doesn't seem to be anyone who is going to step up.

The Aggies are good enough at running the ball that against most teams, even if they stack 8 in the box, the Aggies will still find success on the ground. However, against the Texases and Oklahomas of the world, that won't work. Jovorskie Lane is the sledgehammer in this offense, and the short yardage back, as his 19 touchdowns would attest to. The Aggies will use a split backfield and line up Lane at fullback at times to get him and Mike Goodson on the field together. Goodson is the speed guy and he averaged nearly 7 yards per tote last year while rushing for 847. You can also expect him to be more heavily involved in the passing game, perhaps spending more time lined up wide or in the slot to get himself and Lane on the field together, and to try and find somebody to catch the ball from McGee. The wild card here is freshman Bradley Stephens who is talented enough to see significant playing time, just the question is exactly where do you find that playing time when you already have two All Conference running backs ahead of him?

Last year the offensive line allowed multiple sacks just 5 times, and one of those games was Louisiana Lafayette where a lot of second and third teamers saw playing time. The line also paved the way for a 2,689 yard rushing season with a 5.0 average and 32 rushing touchdowns. No wonder Aggie fans are excited about this ground game as 4 starters return, and the one player who didn't start last year, left guard Chris Yoder, did start 1 games as a redshirt freshmen in 2004 at center. The Aggie line is good enough, and number two tight end Joey Thomas an excellent blocker, that even if teams to attempt to stack the box, the Aggies are still going to have success on the ground, this is a running game you won't be able to completely stop. Last year their lowest output of the season was 146 yards and only once were they limited to under 4.0 ypc. The question is if it's good enough to carry this team to a championship.

On the other side, former Western Michigan coach Gary Darnell did wonders with this defense in his first year as defensive coordinator. A unit that allowed 31.2 ppg and over 300 yards a game through the air decreased those totals to 20.5 and just 191 in just one season. That incredible turnaround was the primary reason the Aggies went from 5-6 to 9-3. The Aggies started 5-2 in 2005 before allowing 42, 56, 36, and 40 points over their final four games, dropping all four. Last year the most Texas A&M allowed was 33, and that was in overtime against Oklahoma State. This year they must replace 5 starters, but only lose 8 lettermen, so plenty of experience is still back for A&M, and you can expect the pass defense to continue to improve as both corners are back. Jordan Peterson and Danny Gorrer started as freshmen and sophomores, respectively, last year and performed quite well. Peterson in particular showed excellent ball skills coming up with two picks and defending 8 other passes, although his inexperience was exploited as he was the goat in allowing two game winning touchdowns and was often the corner teams picked on on 3rd downs. The more playing time he gets though, the better he's going to be. Gorrer isn't quite as good in coverage, but is excellent in run support and he had 52 tackles. The two complement each other well and Arkeith Brown , Marquis Carpenter and Johnathon Baston provide quality veteran depth, with Brown ready to step in and start if Peterson continues to give up key plays in critical situations.

The Aggies use 3 safeties in their 4-2-5 defense, though both the WHIP and SS will feature new starters. Devin Gregg is back at free safety. Gregg, pound for pound is one of the strongest players on the team and in two years has established himself as a quality safety. He had 64 stops a year ago after recording 31 as a freshmen in spot duty. The two strong safety positions will be occupied by new starters, but not necessarily inexperienced ones. Senior Stephen Hodge has the most size of the candidates, but hasn't seen the field much in his career, which at this point, should tell you something. His role is best as a reserve safety and reserve outside linebacker. Alton Dixon, a junior will likely take one of the spots. Dixon has seen the field a bit over his first two years, but keep an eye on Will Harris, a good sized JUCO transfer who will push for time. Also of note is Brock Newton who started 8 games in 2005, and 7 last year before but was dismissed from the team at the end of the season with the possibility of a return. Newton, of all the strong safeties, possesses perhaps the best coverage skills, so getting him back would be a huge plus. Japhus Brown, like Stephen Hodge, is a veteran who may be squeezed out by a younger player. Brown's career began with a ton of promise, starting 10 games as a freshman and making 62 tackles, but he's only had 6 starts the past two seasons. His versatility is a nice bonus. All told, the secondary which had such an astonishing turnaround last year should be even better this season.

Unfortunately for Texas A&M, while the secondary improved, the run defense saw a rather significant falloff. They went from allowing 3.6 ypc to 4.3 and three times surrendered 200 plus on the ground. Their performance against Texas was inspiring, but that was also during the stretch where the Longhorns running game was MIA. Surprisingly enough, after allowing 303 yards a game via the pass last season, the run defense became the weaker spot of the defense as teams actually ran the ball more than they threw it against Texas A&M, and the Aggies played with a lot of leads.

The two linebacker spots are still open for competition. Senior Misi Tupe started 8 games last year, and Mark Dodge started 5. Both are former JUCOs and neither exceptionally gifted athletically, but both serviceable players. Dodge was an honorable mention All Big 12 player a year ago with his 51 tackles despite starting just the 5 games. They will likely fight over one spot while Anthony Lewis and Matt Featherston will duke it out for the other. Lewis is the more athletically gifted of the two, but the sophomore missed most of last year with an injury so he didn't gain the experience the coaches had hoped for. The coaches would like him to win the job, but he'll have to show in fall camp that he was paying attention while on the sidelines last year. Featherston started 1 game last year as well, and had 26 tackles, but he lacks the game changing playmaking skills that Lewis can bring to the table. Two very interesting prospects here are Stephen Hodge who could get moved back to linebacker from safety and true freshmen Derrick Stephens. Stephens, a blue chip recruit is the most talented Aggie linebacker on the roster, but he's also a true freshmen. Don't be surprised if by the end of the season it's not Stephens and Lewis starting at linebacker.

In front of these guys is a defensive line that can boast a couple of legit stars. One of those stars is defensive end Chris Harrington. The Aggies only registered a rather pitiful 20 sacks last year and Harrington had 7.5 of them. The could desperately use someone else to step up to the plate to pressure the quarterback to take some of the pressure off, and some of the attention away, from Harrington. Sophomore Kellen Heard might be the guy to do that. Heard didn't start last year, but saw a little bit of playing time and the former offensive lineman had 2.5 sacks. Heard, at 6'6, 330 lbs is a large body that will go alongside another large body, 6'5, 324 lb Red Bryant. Bryant missed 5 games due to injury last year, so having him healthy for the full season would be extremely helpful for the Aggies in stopping opponents rushing attacks. The end opposite Harrington will likely be Cyril Obiozor, though Michael Bennett will push him extremely hard. Bennett is a little bigger and has been productive when he's been on the field. Obiozor might be a slight bit more athletic, but if that doesn't equal production from the get-go, Bennett will likely take over. Paul Freeny and true freshman Von Miller offer intriguing alternatives at the end position, though Miller is a bit undersized and could use a redshirt year to add some weight. Weight isn't a problem in the middle, not even with the top reserves as they too tip the scales at 300 plus. Vincent Williams is a guy who might steal some snaps from the top two, though he saw little playing time as a freshman. With the size of the tackles, there is no reason the Aggie run defense can't improve. Harrington can get after the quarterback, and between Obiozor, Bennett and Freeny, one would think one of these guys will step up and prove they can as well. If they do, this line could be an improvement over last year's front four which wasn't bad to begin with.

For the first time in the Franchione era, the special teams were more than adequate last year. Another sticking point for Franchione critics was the surprising decline of these units, a trademark of R.C. Slocum's teams. The competition for playing time at linebacker and at safety should lead to even more improvement in the kick coverage units and should make those units among the nation's best. Franks is an elite kickoff returner, averaging close to 28 ypr a year ago. The Aggies will be breaking in a new punt returner and Johnathon Baston is the early favorite, though replacing just 7.4 ypr doesn't leave him big shoes to fill. Punter Justin Brantley was outstanding a year ago, averaging over 44 ypp, though he only forced 4 catches, leaving a lot of his punts returnable, putting more onus on the cover teams. Matt Szymanski saw very limited duty last year as a kicker and will take over the job this year . He has a very strong leg, but was just 2-5 last season with a long of 35.

A&M was 2-12 against ranked foes from 2002 thru 2005, including 7 losses by 20 points or more. Last year the Aggies went 2-1 against top 25 opponents, the one loss a one point loss to Oklahoma that ultimately cost the Aggies the Big 12 South. A&M plays a pretty balanced non conference schedule. The first three games are manageable, though Fresno State has proven to be a very pesky non conference foe, and then there is a Thursday night trip to the Orange Bowl to play Miami. The Aggies should start no worse than 3-1. Franchione is just 1-5 against BCS teams in non-conference play, and going on the road, one can't help but think the Aggies first loss will come on that Thursday night. However, the even bigger game for Texas A&M comes a couple of weeks later when they face off with Oklahoma State at home. Regardless of what happens with Miami, this is the key game on their schedule. If they win this one it puts them in a position to battle it out for the Big 12 South, but more importantly will give them their 5th and possibly 6th win of the year.

Why is this so important?

Because the second half of their schedule is a killer.

They have to play at Texas Tech, at Nebraska, at Oklahoma and at Missouri before closing with Texas at home. That's why the Oklahoma State game is so big. If the Aggies are 4-2 when they travel to Lubbock the cry for Franchione's job will be even louder, and that's a distraction that could either cause this team to completely bog down down the stretch and perhaps miss the postseason entirely, or cause a Clemson type revival that they have every year. In any event, if the defense continues to improve, but the offense, thanks to no passing game, keeps the Aggies from winning 9 or 10 games, expect fans to be calling for Darnell to be the new head coach. Ultimately the pressure on Franchione and the killer second half schedule will be too much for Texas A&M to sustain their success from a year ago. They need someone to step up at linebacker and receiver, if that happens, the Aggies will have a shot to overcome that schedule and still win 8 or 9 games, and if they can win 8 or 9 games with their schedule, Franchione should get an extension.



5. Texas Tech

Mike Leach's program is a model of consistency.

Over the past seven years, the Red Raiders have won 56 games, right at eight per season. In the past five years they've won four bowl games, which nearly doubles what they had won in their entire history before that.

Hopefully Red Raider fans don't get too greedy and start expecting more...even if it would be nice if the program could notch its first 10-win season since 1976. To do so, Tech must find a way to have more success against ranked foes. Leach has lost 13 of 15 against the top ten, and only won six games against the top 25. One of these years you'd think the Red Raiders will knock down the door and and actually be a serious player on the national stage, but this year likely won't be it.

Offensively the Red Raiders score and score a lot, though the 2006 season was a down year by their standards. Their offense scored "just" 32.5 ppg, their lowest mark this decade. Starting a sophomore at quarterback as opposed to their usual first year starting, 5th year senior, might have had something to do with it. So might the fact they averaged just 79 yards a game on the ground, despite a 4.7 ypc. Expect a greater emphasis on the ground game this year as the pass:run ratio was a far too unbalanced 50:17. Graham Harrell is perhaps the highest rated quarterback Texas Tech has ever signed and as a sophomore Harrell threw for 4,555 yards and 38 touchdowns last year. He had his moments of disarray, which was to be expected from a youngster in this complex system, so one can expect some more improvement. Additionally, he was benched on two separate occasions a year ago, moves that Leach admits probably didn't help his quarterback any. This year there is no question the team is his. Another highly touted quarterback coming out of high school, Taylor Potts, will be the top backup and Potts seems more than capable of coming in and doing the job should something happen to Harrell.

The running game doesn't necessarily need to improve, they just need to use it more often, though that may come down to Shannon Woods getting his way out of Leach's doghouse. This isn't the first time Woods has worked his way into Leach's doghouse, though after last spring he worked out of it and ran for 926 yards and ten scores, averaging over 6 ypc and also catching 75 passes. Coming out of spring Leach relegated him to 3rd on the depth chart, but if Leach expects this team to keep its' streak of 14 straight non losing seasons going, he knows he'll need Woods production. If for some reason Woods remains in a backup role, redshirt freshman Kobey Lewis and sophomore Baron Batch will become the featured backs. Batch missed half of last season with an injury, although the coaches are confident he can become a solid contributor.

While they were paving the way for the ground game to get 4.7 ypc, the Red Raiders offensive line was even better in pass protection, permitting just 19 sacks. When you throw the ball 656 times, allowing just 19 sacks is a pretty incredible feat. Unfortunately only one starter is back on the offensive line. That one starter is a pretty good one in Louis Vasquez and he'll be line's anchor at left tackle after playing guard last year. The rest of the line is the question, and it's a BIG question.

Senior Ofa Mohetau was the one guy the staff was depending on to come in and be a reliable option at guard. Mohetau was considered by some the top offensive line prospect coming out of high school when he signed with BYU. He's spent two years at JUCO, and started twice last year for the Red Raiders. A massive 360 lbs, his presence at guard was going to make it a much easier choice to put Vazquez at tackle. However, Mohetau quit the team, so Vazquez still might return to guard. Rylan Reed originally signed with Arkansas but went and played baseball. He's back playing football and while he didn't start last year, he did play in 11 games and he will be one tackle. Sophomores will play at right guard and center, and guard Brandon Carter gives the Red Raiders a 350 lb guard. Four interesting prospects are redshirt freshman Chris Olson and true freshmen Mickey Okafor, Jerrod Gooch and Lonnie Edwards. All were highly thought of coming out of high school and will push for playing time as Edwards and Okafor offer more size than Reed at tackle. Gooch is the most likely of the freshmen to start right off the bat, likely being the one to take over the left guard spot.

Sorting out the offensive line will be vital to the success of the Red Raiders offense this season as this offense is built all on timing. While a repeat of last year's outstanding performance in pass protection is highly unlikely, there was hope this unit wouldn't be a weakness. Unfortunately, Mohetau's loss just leaves more questions in this area.

At wide receiver the Red Raiders lose their top two pass catchers, but with this offense and this system, that's no big deal. When players put up astronomical numbers and then don't succeed in the NFL, it becomes apparent that the numbers are a product of the system, not so much the players. The Red Raiders don't need a bunch of blue chip prospects, just a nice combination of possession guys with good hands and speed guys to stretch the field. They should have that blend again. Danny Amendola will be the go to guy while Todd Walker who is blessed with sub 4.3 speed will be the teams biggest deep threat. Michael Crabtree, Edward Britton and Grant Walker all will see the field quite regularly. Crabtree was a star for the scout team last year and he's going to get a chance to shine on Saturday this season. L.A. Reed is the team's most physical receiver, so don't be surprised if he doesn't become Harrell's favorite target it in the red zone.

There is a misconception that Texas Tech is all offense and no defense. That does Lyle Sentenich's units injustice. Due to the high octane pace the Red Raider offense plays at, to expect any defense to be able to maintain a high level of play for four quarters and be dominant is too much, so considering the increased number of possessions per game due to their offense's style, what this defense does isn't all bad at all. In fact, the Red Raiders, for the past three seasons have kept opponents under 200 ypg passing. The defense was good enough last year for this team to have won double digit games, as in back to back losses to Missouri and Colorado in which they allowed a total of 68 points, Tech still only allowed 340 or so yards per game in those two, being -7 in turnovers in those two games is what killed the Red Raiders. Tech may lose six starters on defense, but due to playing large numbers of players, the Red Raiders return 29 lettermen on that side of the ball.

As mentioned the pass defense has been a strength in Lubbock the past three seasons after being a sore spot in Sentenich's first two years here. This season he brings back both safeties and one corner. His returning starter at cornerback, Chris Parker, is a senior who is a solid tackler and has solid ball skills. He's no shut down elite corner, but he's solid. Teaming beside him is likely to be JUCO De'Shon Sanders, though Marcus Bunton started twice last year and converted tailback Jamar Wall showed some promise a year ago. The safeties though are the strength of this defense, without a doubt. Joe Garcia and Darcel McBath are the two returning leading tacklers on this team. After just three starts his first two years, Garcia burst on the scene last year with 87 tackles, though Tech could afford him to make a few more plays in pass coverage. McBath is the one who, if not for the gluttony of safeties in the state of Oklahoma would be a lot better known had a banner sophomore year. He was great in run support with 75 stops, but he, unlike Garcia, also excelled in pass defense, nabbing three interceptions and defending five others. Daniel Charbonnet started two games at Duke as a true freshman and he provides the depth with Lance Fuller. Anthony Hines is an interesting proposition as at 236 lbs he's not your typical sized safety.

Fletcher Session and Brock Stratton are no longer suiting up to play linebacker for the Red Raiders, and that could pose a big problem. Kellen Tillman is the lone returning starter at linebacker. After tearing an ACL in 2003 and missing 2004 as well with it, he played sparingly in 2005 before getting ten starts last season. Tillman wasn't anything special but he was solid, and Tech is counting on him to be the leader of the linebacker corps this season. Without Stratton there to steal all the tackles, Tillman should improve on his 41 tackles of a year ago. If he doesn't, it's a bad sign for this defense. Paul Williams, another senior, is slated to move into the middle. Williams is another player who has benefited from Sentenich's aptness to play a lot of players on defense, as he started 6 games last year and has recorded 46 tackles the past two years. On the weak side sophomore Blake Collier will compete with senior Chad Hill for that spot. Collier is the more athletic and offers the chance to make more big plays, but he's also on the smallish side, can be exposed when being run at directly, and is less experienced. Chad Hill hasn't played much in his first three years however. If Williams can be the steadying influence on one side, Leach will probably turn this position over to Collier and use his athleticism to try and create more big plays for this defense. Not one player on this team last year had as many as four tackles behind the line of scrimmage a year ago, so they need playmakers to emerge. The starters should be okay at linebacker this year, but if injuries hit this unit, things could get very shaky, as this year there is no depth.

The run defense kept teams around the 150 ypg and 4.0 ypc mark for the second straight year. However, against some of the better running teams, Tech struggled mightily against the run, as TCU hit 180, Texas A&M 250, Colorado 228, Texas 227, Oklahoma State 221, and Minnesota 195. Those numbers are somewhat surprising considering the talent on the front four, though Dek Bake and Keyunta Dawson were known much more for their pass rushing talents than their run stopping prowess. Jake Ratliff returns at one defensive end position as the lone returning starter. Ratliff was an honorable mention Big 12 performer a year ago as he started all 13 games and recorded 4 sacks. At 6'8 he also used his height to get in passing lanes as he batted down four passes. Tech is still searching for the answer opposite Ratliff. Sam Fehoko is a talented freshman who played linebacker in high school who will likely play is way onto the field at some position. He may be pressed into service at linebacker, though the coaches see him as potentially an all star as a pass rusher at defensive end. Sophomore Brandon Williams though appears to have the inside track to start opposite Ratliff. Williams is a fairly good athlete and saw the field quite a bit as a true freshman a year ago, recording 3.5 sacks. Being a full time player the Raiders think he could approach the 6 or 7 mark, though concerns still exist over how he'll hold up against the run. Inside is even less stable for Tech. They are counting on a pair of sophomores in Rajon Henley and Richard Jones to step in and in the very least keep the run defense where it was a year ago, if not improve. Henley however isn't very big, so Brian Jones who is 40 lbs heavier will likely see a lot of playing time in running situations. Jones played in six last year before being injured. Richard Jones, the other starter saw action in ten games last season, but behind him is JUCO Brandon Sharpe who at 240 lbs is vastly undersized to play inside. The defensive line should be effective at getting after the passer, but it's lack of size and experience, especially in the middle are going to leave this defense very vulnerable against the run, and considering the number of quality rushing attacks this team will face this year, that could be very costly.

Further proof that Tech gets by with less than stellar recruits at receiver and running back, and lives off its system, is the ineffectiveness of the return game. Neither Woods nor Eric Morris were effective on kickoffs, and neither could even muster 18 ypr. Amendola was a little better on punts at 9.2, as his is the only job that's safe. Freshmen receiver Detron Lewis, who would ideally be redshirted, may be used as a return man. Also, Todd Walker and Michael Crabtree could see time there as well. They have to replace Alex Reyes at punter, and that's no small task. Reyes was one of the nation's best a year ago and freshman Jonathan LaCour is expected to take the job, though there's not a lot of confidence in him. Alex Trlica is back to kick field goals and he was 15-21 a year ago, but he has knocked through 166 straight extra points.

This Texas Tech team has more questions than perhaps any other in the Mike Leach era. Their ten returning starters are the fewest in both the conference, and in Leach's tenure. Serious questions abound on both lines and that will prevent this team from making any real noise in the South. The skill positions are set on offense, and the secondary is one of the league's best, however linebacker is an area of uncertainty that might determine the fate of this team. If the linebackers can play decent and keep the defense afloat, Tech should be able to make a bowl game. They get Iowa State and Colorado at home from the north, and Tech should dispose of Baylor, meaning they will need three non conference wins to achieve bowl eligibility. There is no guarantee they will get them as SMU, UTEP, and Rice could all pose legit challenges, though the Tech offense should be enough to get them past all three.

Another seven win season is still a definite possibility for the Red Raiders; the question being what bowl will they make it to. A lot will depend on Notre Dame. If the Irish are bowl eligible and not selected to the Gator Bowl, then it will be the International Bowl or Sun Bowl that gets Notre Dame. If it's the Sun Bowl, it's one less spot for the Big Twelve. If Tech gets to bowl eligibility and beats Colorado one would assume they'd get the bowl nod over Colorado, but the Buffs travel well and after a one year absence, a bowl might go with the bigger name Buffaloes, so Texas Tech may have a tough time finding a postseason home.


6. Baylor

You've got Duke in the East, Stanford in the West, and Baylor in the Midwest—three BCS programs that would be fortunate to make the playoffs in the FCS.

Guy Morris has been given 4 years already in Waco, which is a lot longer than most people have gotten, and a lot of that is due to his 5-6 year in 2005. Baylor has gone 9-14 the past two years, the best two year stretch in a long time for this program.

Coincidentally, it's the same record another dormant BCS program, Vanderbilt, has had in the same span. Baylor has also won five conference games the past two years, one more than Vanderbilt. Yet everyone is talking about the improvement of the Vanderbilt program, and how Baylor is still a joke.

Why?

The Bears might not be as funny as one would think.

Keep in mind in 2005 they lost in overtime to both Texas A&M and Oklahoma, otherwise this team would've finished 4th in the South and made a bowl. Last year they lost to Army in overtime and by two to Washington State, again just missing out on the postseason. Of course, when you look at some of the stats from this Baylor team, you start to think again they are THAT far away.

The Bears offense last year scored 23.6 ppg, which is actually nothing short of remarkable considering they only rushed for 40 ypg. Averaging barely over two yards an attempt the Bears running attack was one of the worst major college football has seen in recent memory, so how they scored the number of points they did is really amazing. Just four starters return to this offense, and unfortunately for Baylor they are not the school's number two all time passer, Shawn Bell, and his top two receivers from a year ago. So the only thing that made this offense look alive a year ago must be completely retooled. Michael Machen, a Kent State transfer was expected to be the favorite to start at quarterback, but he was completely unimpressive in practice and now may be relegated to 3rd string duty. Sophomore Blake Szymanski and JUCO John David Weed will leg it out right up until their trip to Forth Worth to play TCU to see who is the starting quarterback. Weed offers more as a passer while Szymanski has more mobility and did start three games a year ago, though his performance in those three games probably doesn't help his cause any. While the potential is there for this position to not be a weakness, expecting any of the candidates to play as well as Bell is expecting way too much.

A combined 107 receptions, 1,500 yards and 11 touchdowns left via the likes of Dominique Ziegler and Trent Shelton. Now the Bears have to find adequate replacements. Thomas White is a sure thing to start, as in 5 starts last year he caught 26 passes. However, there are doubts as to if the junior can be the number one threat, though he does offer good size. The guy they will look to become the number one is David Gettis, who talent-wise is heads and shoulders above everyone else on the roster, in fact, talent-wise, he was the best Bear wideout last season. At 6'4, 206 and with 4.35 speed, Gettis has the tools to become a big time playmaker. If he makes use of his natural talents, the Bears passing game may not slip much after all because Gettis will command a lot of attention enabling the other able bodies to have a chance to make an impact. Gettis is the key to this unit, as the Bears will likely rotate as many as six other players at the two slot spots inside of White and Gettis. Tight end Justin Akers had a minimal impact as a freshman, so the Bears are hoping for a little more this year.

Time to throw was a precious commodity a year ago as the Bear offensive line allowed 36 sacks, including five games in which they allowed four or more. So is having three returning starters really a good thing? These are three players returning to a line that paved the way for a massive 40 yards per game and allowed 36 sacks. Then again, those three can't help but improve. Jayson Smith and Thad Boatner will be the tackles, though some concern exists as neither tops 290 lbs. Smith started 7 games as a redshirt freshman, but at tight end. He put on some weight last