Earlier today, the Oregon Ducks fell short yet again, losing to conference rival Arizona by 10 points, and dropped to 0-11 in Pac-10 games this season.
There have been many "reasons" declared for why this year's edition of the Oregon Ducks Mens Basketball team is experiencing troubles. Fans and sports analysts across the country have commented on the Ducks youth.
Granted, eight freshmen are on the roster, which totals to more than 50 percent of the team, but this is not the reason why the Ducks are under-performing this season.
All of Oregon's problems relate to one, obvious blemish, Head Coach Ernie Kent. Kent has coached at Oregon for 14 years. He is the winning-est head coach in Oregon Men's Basketball history. He has "led" the Ducks to five NCAA tournament berths, and two NIT appearances.
While this résumé appears very impressive, when one reads between the lines, and scavanges through the history of each tournament berth, the evidence is very clear. All but one of Ernie Kent's postseason appearances have been because of a senior leader on the team.
Let me make a few things straight. I am not saying that Kent should lose his job because his team does not hold a senior leader. If we look into history, we'll see my point.
As mentioned before, all but one of Kent's tournament appearances have had one thing in common, a senior leader. The only exception was the 2002 appearance when PG Luke Ridnour was a junior.
Yes, seniors should be good players, and leaders, but the fact that players like Luke Jackson, Aaron Brooks, Malik Hairston, Bryce Taylor, and Maarty Leunen all came to full potential their senior years does not seem very attractive given the fact that all of these players were highly-rated, very sought after recruits.
Kent does not find diamonds in the rough. If there is any credit to his coaching career, it is through is charisma. Kent has brought in more four and five star recruits in his coaching career than all past Oregon coaches combined.
While it's all fine and dandy to bring in great recruits, it does a team no good if these players do not improve during their college careers.
This brings me to my next point. Kent can recruit with the best coaches in the country, but when it comes to coaching and player development, Kent becomes an eyesore.
Take Malik Hairston for example. Hairston played high school basketball before pre-college players were prohibited from entering the NBA Draft. Hairston was considered the best G/F recruit in the country during his senior season, and one of the best overall recruits.
He was considering entering the NBA Draft, but instead chose to attend the University of Oregon.
Many fans and sports analysts expected that the combination of Oregon's 2003 and 2004 recruiting classes, which included Aaron Brooks, Mitch Platt, Ray Schafer, Kenny Love, Malik Hairston, Maarty Leunen, Churchill Odia, Chamberlain Oguchi, and Bryce Taylor, where none of these recruits received a rating below three stars, would bring countless Pac-10 championships, and quite possibly, and second NCAA championship.
The Ducks won the first ever NCAA Men's Basketball Championship in 1939.
Instead, the Ducks experienced many troubles. Three star big men Platt and Schafer rarely saw playing time. The sharpshooting Oguchi transferred after his sophomore season due to his lack of playing time. The "Fab Four" of Brooks, Hairston, Taylor, and Leunen never saw career seasons until their respective senior years.
Does it not seem blazingly obvious? Kent can recruit as evidenced, but he cannot develop his talent. We can also talk about his incompetency in in-game coaching. Just ask the 2007-2008 Oregon Ducks team.
The Ducks received an at-large bid into the big dance after an above average season, and an impressive, although short lived, Pac-10 tournament run.
The Ducks played their first round game against the Mississippi State Bulldogs. Most of the sports world picked the Ducks to win the game, and for most of the contest, it looked like the Ducks would live to play another day. But during the last half of the second half, Kent's incompetency revealed itself.
Oregon was getting killed in the categories of points in the paint, rebounding, and blocked shots. Kent had two talented, though rarely used big men in Platt and Schafer. Instead of bring them in to help the Ducks on both sides of the ball, Kent stuck with a smaller lineup. Leunen at 6'8'' was the tallest player of the floor.
Even though Oregon had built a comfortable lead in the first half, their disadvantages aforementioned ended up costing them the game.
If you need more examples, look at games that have occurred this season, mainly the past three games for the Ducks against hated rival Oregon State, and the two Arizona schools, Arizona State and Arizona.
In all three of these games, Oregon either had a small lead, or was down by less than ten points. Once the second half started however, Oregon fell into a slump each and every game. Instead of noticing this and changing the game-plan to help his team, Kent did not change a thing, and as known, the Ducks lost each game.
The Ducks should not be winless in the Pac-10. Moreover, they should not have a sub .500 record. Do I think that the Ducks should be undefeated, no. Do I think that they should be at least a few games over .500, yes.
Oregon's 2008 recruiting class was one of the best in school history. The class of Michael Dunigan, Josh Crittle, Matthew Humphrey, Teondre Williams, Garrett Sim, and Drew Wiley brought a huge sense of hope and faith into the Ducks team. The loss of the "Big Three", Hairston, Taylor, and Leunen, seemed to have been made up for.
Instead, the Ducks find themselves at 0-11 in Pac-10 play, and 6-17 on the season.
Yes, the Ducks are a very young team. But team leaders such as juniors Tajaun Porter and Joevan Catron have yet to reach their full potential.
If this all is not enough to convince one of Kent's abysmal coaching abilities, all one needs to do is look at Oregon's team huddles during time outs. One will see Oregon players gathered around a clipboard, with a play being drawn out.
But who is talking? Who is coaching the team? Kent's mouth is seen unopened. Instead it is his assistants that are coaching the team, not Kent.
All I can say is, is that if Oregon State Head Coach Craig Robinson can win conference games with the talent level he has, and Ernie Kent still has yet to win a conference game with the talent level he has, then there is something very wrong with the picture. It shows one how good of a coach Robinson is, and how insignificant of a coach Kent is.
What will it take for Oregon's athletic department to finally realize that Kent is not the coach that will bring home a NCAA championship for the Ducks? What will it take for the alumni association to donate enough money to buy out Kent's contract?
If the Oregon Ducks do not want their amazingly talented but raw recruiting class to go to waste, like most of Kent's recruiting classes have, then Kent needs to be fired immediately. Let one of Kent's assistants take the wheel for the rest of the season. The recruiting is not strongly needed this season.
Then the Ducks can focus their offseason attentions on hiring a new coach. One who can recruit, and progress players quickly. Names like Gonzaga's Mark Few, or Portland State's Ken Bone fit the coaching description of Oregon's needs perfectly.
Unless Kent is fired now, or unless his contract is bought out now, Oregon will be listening to the broken record epitome that is Kent's coaching career: Mediocrity to below average seasons 90 percent of the time, with an NCAA or NIT appearance occasionally.
The time for action is now. Make the right decision, Oregon.