Gillingham extended their unbeaten run to seven games today, with a rather comfortable 4-0 victory at the KRBS Priestfield stadium.
Simon King gave Gillingham the perfect start on six minutes, heading home from a Nicky Southall free-kick. Adam Miller made it two on 58 minutes, tapping the ball in after Mark McCammon's shot was parried by the Rotherham keeper.
The score was made 3-0 on 78 minutes, as centre-half Garry Richards got on the end of John Nutter's cross and headed home unchallenged. And just to put the icing on the cake, there was also a first senior goal for Luis Cumbers; the 20-year old tapping in an Albert Jarrett cross two minutes from time.
It was a fantastic win for the Gills, which was made rather easy after Danny Harrison got himself sent off for a challenge on captain Barry Fuller with only 35 minutes of the game played.
And after winning by such a big scoreline (well, it is for the Gills), I will analyse three things that determined the scoreline.
The Formation
In the first half, Gillingham played a basic 4-4-2 , Simeon Jackson returning from injury to partner the on-loan Andrew Barcham up front.
This formation worked quite well; Rotherham couldn't break us down and we scored, through centre-back Simon King's header early on to give the Gills a perfect start.
In the second half, we switched to a 4-3-3 formation, with midfielder Curtis Weston being replaced by Mark McCammon, another key striker returning from injury.
Now, I had doubts about this formation, as although we would have more players up-front, we were now more vulnerable at the back, as losing that extra midfield player has proved so costly for us before.
However, manager Mark Stimson got the formation spot on, and the 4-3-3 paid dividends as we scored three goals in the second half.
A great decision by the manager, if we had kept a 4-4-2 we could've been less likely to attack as often, and therefore might've given 10-man Rotherham chances to attack us. And it almost goes without saying that it was better than the 4-5-1 formation, for obvious reasons.
The Substitutions
There was one key substitution that stood out for me; replacing Simeon Jackson with the young Luis Cumbers.
With many players tiring out on the pitch, (from both Gillingham and Rotherham), Stimson decided to bring on fresh legs and replace the rather tired Simeon Jackson with the quick-footed Luis Cumbers.
And with Gillingham 3-0 up, it was the perfect time for young Cumbers to show what he could do without the pressure of a tight game.
And he did.
The tired Rotherham defence could not keep up with him, and the substitution paid dividends when he scored Gillingham's fourth, boosting the Gills' goal difference as well as emphatically wrapping up three points.
Another important substitution by Stimson was to give Mark McCammon a game and change to the 4-3-3 formation.
This was good for McCammon, as he needed a game to get back to full fitness, and good for Gillingham as it meant they could play the 4-3-3 and really attack an un-suspecting Rotherham, who would've expected Gillingham to shut up shop and defend for the second half, as in previous matches, remember the 4-5-1?
Counter Attack
This is a clear weakness for Gillingham; they are simply not capable of striking teams on the counter attack.
The ball breaks out from the edge of the box, and Gillingham find themselves facing their opponent's goal with four their players compared to only three of their opponent's.
Now, where Gillingham seem to fail with the counter attack is that the player with the ball always gets caught in two minds. They don't know whether to run with it for a bit, or release it now to the forward making the run.
They spend a bit too long on the ball and then get closed down, and the counter attack stops.
Or occasionally they release the ball at the right time, in which case either the accuracy on the pass is always lacking, or the forward or player making the run seems incapable of controlling the ball.
It is these basic technical skills that are lacking from the lower league players, which makes them simply unable to create a decent counter attack. Gillingham had eight opportunities for a counter attack in this game, and not once did they actually manage to counter attack.
If they had been able on at least two or three of those occasions, I can assure you Gillingham would've won by a bigger scoreline.
The game against Rotherham was meant to be the toughest test in the Coca Cola League Two for Gillingham, a thought shared the fans, the players and the manager. However, if this game's result is anything to go by, despite failing on the counter attack, overall Gillingham passed with flying colours.