"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." George Santayana
With great fanfare, the Winnipeg Blue Bombers recently announced the return of former offensive coordinator Mike Kelly as the club’s new head coach.
While I’m fairly certain Mr. Santayana was not referring to this hiring when making the above quote, I am sure the Winnipeg Football Club would have been well served to heed its warning.
As a huge fan of the club, I am fearful that by not acknowledging past hiring errors, the Bombers are doomed to suffer mediocrity once again in the face of their most recent hiring.
The reason for this fear might simply be the natural skepticism and pessimism that arises from supporting a team in the midst of an 18-year championship drought in an eight-team league, or it might be that I can’t shake the feeling that we’ve seen this all before.
My mind takes me to a previous season much like the one recently experienced. For your examination, I’d like to offer a comparison of the 2008 and 1996 CFL seasons. You’ll see that there are some ominous parallels that seem to have been ignored (some rightfully so) by Lyle "Tower of Power" Bauer when searching for his new coach.
In both years, the Grey Cup was won by a team led by a former Chicago Bear Quarterback (Burris 2008, Flutie 1996). Bomberland was in mourning following a playoff defeat to the hated Eskimos and the firing of the crusty coach who had led them to that loss (Berry 2008, Cal Murphy 1996).
To add to the gloomy outlook following both seasons, a legendary Bomber icon was considering retirement (Stegall 2008, Walby 1996). In response to these situations, the club offered two unconventional hires as their new head coaches.
Both were assistant coaches (though neither an offensive or defensive coordinator at the time) from rival Western Division opponents (2008 Kelly arrives from the Eskimos, 1996 Jeff Reinebold arrived from the Lions).
These new coaches both had experience as a head coach at a small American college, both had assistant coaching experience in other pro leagues, and both had assistant coached in the CFL.
Both were chosen because it was felt that they demonstrated enthusiasm and energy, though not necessarily experience, and were seen as implements to restoring the tradition of the Bombers.
Known as player’s coaches, the appointment of these new kingpins (both were rookies) was heartily endorsed by players around the league as a great move for deserving candidates.
Now these parallel circumstances can easily be chalked up to coincidence, but to be able to compare any aspect of a new hiring to that of the Reinebold era should give any Bomber fan the willies.
It's like eating a piece of Grandma’s fruitcake at Christmas. You didn’t like it last year, but somehow you think that maybe this time around it will taste good and not give you the runs. Here's hoping the Kelly era spares us the runs the Reinebold era gave us.
What bothers me the most is not necessarily the fact that there are similarities between the two hirings. It's that the most glaring of those similarities is found in the thin nature of their head coaching resumes.
One of the mistakes the Bombers made in hiring Reinebold is that he had never proven himself as a head coach at any level; he was an unknown quantity. Based on his resume, the same can certainly be said of Kelly as well.
In fact, Reinebold’s one year of head coaching at Rocky Mountain College was at least a winning one. Kelly has two losing seasons to show for his time as headman at Valdosta State University.
What other qualifications for head coaching does Kelly bring? He was a pro personnel assistant in the NFL- but I’m not sure how that qualifies one to be HEAD coach of an entire organization.
He made the Pro Bowl as a coach, something Reinebold most certainly did not. Upon closer inspection, though, we see that the whole staff of the Championship game runner-up team automatically makes the Pro Bowl.
It’s not as if he was recognized for his individual excellence. Jim Sorgi has a Super Bowl ring; that does not necessarily make him a Super Bowl quarterback. Mike Kelly went to the Pro Bowl, but it does not necessarily make him a Pro Bowl coach.
From my research, it seems that Kelly was a glorified video guy/scout in his time in the NFL. This is nothing to scoff at, but are the recesses of the video room where you want to be getting your next head coach?
It seems then that Mike Kelly’s strongest credentials for being headman are found in his time as Bomber Offensive Coordinator, an era in Bomber history burned in my memory by hard losses in big games.
Like the 12 points Kelly’s vaunted offence scored in the 1994 Eastern Final, playing on our home turf here in Winnipeg. Or the back-to-back Grey Cup losses in 1992 and 1993.
Or how about the aforementioned 1996 playoff debacle in Edmonton? The OC has to take some responsibility for the whopping seven points on offense scored that day.
Obviously, all these losses can’t simply be hung on Mr. Kelly (he wasn’t even the offensive coordinator for all those games) but if these were his most prolific years, then I must be missing something.
Is this legacy the foundation the Bombers are looking to build on? What kind of glory days are the Bombers trying to bring back? The Raiders had their "commitment to excellence" in the 70s and 80s. Are the Bombers now "committed to almost being good"?
In contrast to the new Bomber coach, recent CFL coaching successes have had far, far more accomplished resumes before obtaining their first CFL jobs. Both John Hufnagel and Mark Trestman not only had position coaching experience but also coordinator experience at the NFL level before landing in Canada.
In contrast, Mike Kelly has not been a coordinator of any sort, at a level higher than the XFL, for over 10 years. In fact, if we were to look at his football coaching work over the last four years, we would see just one year as a receivers’ coach with Edmonton.
Now helping make Kamau Peterson an all-star receiver is pretty much a miracle in itself, so maybe I am selling Mr. Kelly short. If being a good receivers coach, though, is a key criterion in becoming a good head coaching candidate, than I hope the Bombers gave a serious look at their own receivers coach, Bobby Dyce.
His receiving crew, with a weaker quarterback throwing the ball, had a far better season than Kelly’s did in Edmonton. Maybe Dyce will get the vacant head-coaching job in Edmonton.
Wait a minute. That won’t happen because there can only be one team dumb enough to hire some other team’s receivers coach to be their head coach (if you're not paying attention, that's the Bombers).
I hope I am wrong, that the sense of dread I get when I see this hiring is like the one I used to get when I thought a monster was under my bed (its also same feeling I currently get when Tom Canada is "containing" from the edge).
I would psyche myself in to believing that something hideous was down there and only when the lights came on and I looked under the bed did I realize it was only a pair of dirty underwear, and not a monster, that was down there.
Here’s hoping that my fears in to the Bombers are also completely unfounded and that Mike Kelly is just that: a harmless, dirty pair of underwear capable of leading the Bombers to the Grey Cup.
As for George Santayana and his quote; here’s hoping he’s right, because I’ve been purposely forgetting 1988 and 1990 in the hopes that they can be repeated.