Mercedes Domination of Formula 1 Is Nothing New, so Just Enjoy It

The way some people are talking about Mercedes' current domination of the Formula One World Championship, you would be forgiven for thinking that no other team has a chance of ever winning another race.
Yes, the Silver Arrows have won the past two constructors' championships, sweeping away all the competition, but the same thing has happened previously in F1. And—spoiler alert—when Mercedes' reign does end, someone else will do the same thing in the future.
Would it be nice to have more competition at the front of the grid? Of course—but let's not forget all the amazing racing and drama we have experienced over the last two years, not to mention the highly advanced hybrid technology powering the current generation of F1 cars.
But none of that will stop the naysayers, a group that ironically includes F1 chief executive officer Bernie Ecclestone. In August, he told Dutch TV station Sport 1 (h/t jamesallenonf1.com), "What we've got at the moment, which is wrong, is one very, very, very dominant team—with a particularly dominant engine."

Recall that Mercedes' two winning seasons were preceded by four straight Red Bull championships and, before that, Ferrari won eight constructors' titles in a 10-year period.
For an illustration of where Mercedes' current run of form fits in with some of the all-time great performances, the table below displays the best two-year period achieved by any team in each decade of F1 history.
Years | Team | Grands Prix | Wins | Winning % |
---|---|---|---|---|
2014 and 2015 | Mercedes | 38 | 32 | 84.2 |
2001 and 2002 | Ferrari | 34 | 24 | 70.6 |
1992 and 1993 | Williams | 32 | 20 | 62.5 |
1988 and 1989 | McLaren | 32 | 25 | 78.1 |
1972 and 1973 | Lotus | 27 | 12 | 44.4 |
1966 and 1967 | Brabham | 20 | 8 | 40.0 |
1952 and 1953 | Ferrari | 17 | 14 | 82.4 |
Some of these choices are relatively subjective. Maybe Lotus' 1962 and 1963 seasons, for example, were better than Brabham's 1967 and 1968. But Lotus didn't win the constructors' championship in the former year, so I went with Brabham.
As you can see, Mercedes-style F1 dominance goes all the way back to the first years of the championship. In 1952, Ferrari team-mates Alberto Ascari and Piero Taruffi won seven of eight races. In fact, they won all seven F1 races, but the Indianapolis 500 was also part of the championship that year and, although Ascari entered, he did not finish.
The next year, Ascari and Nino Farina took seven of eight races they entered for the Scuderia, dropping only the last race of the season, at Monza, once Ascari had already clinched the drivers' title (there was no constructors' championship in those days).
The 1960s were perhaps the golden era of F1 competition, with six different constructors' champions that decade and Brabham the only back-to-back winners.
In the 1970s, Ferrari won four titles in five seasons from 1975 to 1979, although the most dominant consecutive seasons belonged to Lotus earlier in the decade. Led by Emerson Fittipaldi (joined by Ronnie Peterson for 1973), Colin Chapman's outfit won half of the races over the 1972 and '73 seasons, but they could have had even more.

In '72, Fittipaldi retired from three races with mechanical problems in 12 races—the equivalent of five such retirements today—and still managed to win five times. Mercedes team-mates Lewis Hamilton and Nico Rosberg combined for just three mechanical retirements in 2015.
And that is another major reason why races are more predictable today: There are fewer retirements. We can't blame Mercedes for that. No manufacturer is going to intentionally build a car that breaks down.
From 1988 to 1991, McLaren took four straight constructors' championships. In the first two years of that streak, Alain Prost and Ayrton Senna combined to win 25 of 32 races. Again, they could have won even more, but for the lower reliability of the period (and, you know, those times they took each other out).
F1 is cyclical. Ferrari wins for a while, then someone else, then Ferrari again. Some years there are two or more realistic contenders for the championship, some years there is a clear favourite.
So maybe, instead of complaining about how F1 was so much better in the 1990s or 1960s or 1950s, we should just sit back and enjoy what we are seeing: a team reaching the pinnacle of the pinnacle of motorsport. It has happened many times in the past, and it will happen again.
Oh, and F1 was way better in the nineties, when I started watching.
Follow me on Twitter for updates when I publish new articles and for other (mostly) F1-related news and banter: